Bioactive Glass
DeviceSurgical implantation
Other names: Bonalive (Vivoxid Ltd, Turku, Finland)
NCT Number: NCT00841152
This study is designed to perform a head-to-head comparison of two synthetic ceramic bone graft substitutes, bioactive glass (BAG) and beta-tricalcium phosphate (TCP), in filling of contained bone defects following surgical evacuation of benign bone tumor or tumor-like conditions. Based on the investigators' previous preclinical research and an ongoing single-center randomized clinical trial on bioactive glass filling, the investigators expect BAG filling to be more efficient compared to TCP in promotion of defect healing and functional recovery after surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
This study is designed to perform a head-to-head comparison of two synthetic ceramic bone graft substitutes, bioactive glass (BAG) and beta-tricalcium phosphate (TCP), in filling of contained bone defects following surgical evacuation of benign bone tumor or tumor-like conditions. Small metacarpal and phalangeal enchondromas (Stratum I) and large long-bone lesions (Stratum II) will be evaluated separately. Aside with the head-to-head comparison of the two synthetic bone graft substitutes, autologous bone graft (Stratum I) and allogeneic bone graft (Stratum II) will be used as the standard of care controls.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Surgical implantation
Other names: Bonalive (Vivoxid Ltd, Turku, Finland)
Surgical implantation
Other names: ChronOs (Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland)
Surgical transplantation from iliac crest
Surgical transplantation
Time frame: 3 months
Hand and finger grip strength measured by a standard device
Time frame: 6 months
CT-evaluation of cortical defect healing
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months
Radiographic evaluation of bioactive glass and bone graft incorporation
Time frame: 3,6, and 12 months
Evaluation of postoperative pain
Time frame: 3,6, and 12 months
Evaluation of patient-related outcome
Time frame: 3,6, and 12 months
Evaluation of patient-related outcome
Time frame: 0-3 months
Clinical evaluation of surgical wound healing
Time frame: 0-12 months
Clinical evaluation of soft tissue complications in the surgical area
Time frame: 0-12 months
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of complications of bone defect healing
Turku University Hospital
Other Gov
A National, Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Head-to-Head Comparison of Bioactive Glass and Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate as Bone Graft Substitute in Filling of Contained Bone Defects
Acronym: BAGvsTCP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04884048
Bone Diseases, Bone Neoplasm
Nancy, Grand Est, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06376539
Bone Diseases, Bone Neoplasm
Bologna, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07379008
Bone Cysts, Bone Defects
Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05310539
Bone Diseases, Bone Neoplasm
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
View Trial Details