Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03357679

Comparison of Bed up Head Elevated Intubation Position With Glidescope Assisted Tracheal Intubation

Positioning during the process of tracheal intubation is critical, as optimal positioning can greatly facilitate successful intubation. Many complications can occur as a result of failed intubation, ranging from airway injury, lack of oxygen, with even deaths. Today, the most popular positioning of patients for intubation is in the "sniffing" position. There is however evidence to support that intubation in the bed-up-head-elevated position may be better. In today's technological age, video assisted laryngoscopy (Laryngoscopy is the process of visualizing the vocal cords prior to intubation), a new method where the anaesthetist intubates a patient via aid of an image guided view of the airway, is increasingly popular due to its reliability and superiority to normal intubation. However, it is not widely available, and may suffer from technical breakdowns. The Glidescope is one example of a video laryngoscope, and has been widely researched in the medical literature. In this study, the investigators wish to investigate whether intubation in the bed-up-head-elevated position will be as good as, if not better than Glidescope assisted tracheal intubation, in patients undergoing elective surgery and planned for general anaesthesia.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University Malaya Medical Centre

Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia
  • Patients aged from 18 years old to 75 years old
  • Patients who are able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with airway obstruction
  • Patients with contraindications to neck extension
  • Patients with small mouth opening (<3 cm)
  • BMI > 35 kg/m3
  • Patients with ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and respiratory diseases
  • Patients in whom rapid sequence induction is indicated

Treatment and study plan

tracheal intubation

Procedure

Intubation of the trachea with endotracheal tube

Glidescope assisted tracheal intubation

Device

With the use of the Glidescope video laryngoscope, the trachea will be intubated with the endotracheal tube

Bed up head elevated tracheal intubation

Device

Use of the Macintosh laryngoscope blade size 3

Primary outcomes

  1. Laryngeal exposure

    Time frame: Through study completion, period of 1 year

    Measured by Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) score. A 100% POGO score refers to visualisation of the entire glottic opening from the anterior commissure of the vocal cords to the interarytenoid notch. A POGO score of 0% refers to no visualisation of laryngeal structures. A 100% score is optimal.

  2. Time required for intubation

    Time frame: Through study completion, period of 1 year

    Measured from the time the tip of the laryngoscope passes through the incisors to the time of the first recorded wave of capnography

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of intubation attempts

    Time frame: Through study completion, period of 1 year

  2. Effort during laryngoscopy

    Time frame: Through study completion, period of 1 year

    Assessed based on a visual analogue scale, with 10 being the strongest effort, and 1 being the least effort required.

  3. Complications arising from intubation

    Time frame: Through study completion, period of 1 year

    Incidence of hypoxia, hypotension, or esophageal intubation. Yes/no categories.

  4. Airway trauma

    Time frame: Through study completion, period of 1 year

    Whether injury occurs to the lips, tongue, teeth, and other structures in the oropharyngeal area. Yes/no categories.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Malaya

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Bed up Head Elevated Intubation Position With Glidescope Assisted Tracheal Intubation: A Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Nov 30, 2017
Registry last updated
Sep 17, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.