CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, Gard, 30029, France
NCT Number: NCT01543360
The main objective of this study is to compare the rate of successful establishment of a central venous catheter in the first two attempts of ultrasound-guided puncture between two techniques: (1) a subclavian technique versus (2) an axillary technique.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Nîmes, Gard, 30029, France
The secondary objectives of this study are to compare the following between the two techniques:
The reasons catheter placement failures will also be described.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The first two attempts at central venous catheterization will be performed via the distal approach (axillary vein). The third and fourth attempts at central venous catheterization will be performed by the medial approach (subclavian vein). The same puncture material/devices will be used in both arms of the study.
The first two attempts at central venous catheterization will be performed by the medial approach (subclavian vein). The third and fourth attempts at central venous catheterization will be performed by the distal approach (axillary vein). The same puncture material/devices will be used in both arms of the study.
Time frame: approximately 3 minutes
yes/no
Time frame: approximately 3 minutes
yes/no
Time frame: approximately 3 minutes
yes/no
Time frame: approximately 3 minutes
For non-failures (ie establishment of a central venous catheter within 4 puncture attempts), the number of minutes necessary for the establishment of a central venous catheter
Time frame: approximately 3 minutes
all cases, in minutes
Time frame: Day 1
arterial puncture (yes / no), pneumothorax (yes / no), hemothorax (yes / no), hematoma (yes / no), nerve injury (yes / no), aberrant course (yes / no)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Other
Comparison of Axillary Versus Subclavian Vein Strategies for Central Venous Catheterization Under Continuous Ultrasound Guidance: a Prospective, Randomized, Non-inferiority Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06050902
Central Venous Catheterization, Ultrasound Guidance
Nîmes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07582107
Central Venous Catheterization, Monitoring
Ankara, ÇANKAYA, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06469034
Central Venous Catheterization
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04690296
Central Venous Catheterization
View Trial Details