Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03240848

Comparison of Artificial Intelligent Clinic and Normal Clinic

In this study, the investigators provide participants≤14 years old the artificial intelligent clinic or normal clinic in the purpose of seeking out a better way to make a definite diagnosis with high efficiency and accuracy, and report a prospective, randomized controlled study aiming at comparison of artificial intelligent clinic and normal clinic for diagnosing congenital cataract.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Cataract Eye Diseases Lens Diseases

Age range

1 month–14 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Zhognshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China

About this study

Children ≤14 years old from ophthalmic clinic without treatment were enrolled to a prospective, randomized controlled study. Patients were assigned to two groups: participants in group A went to the artificial intelligent clinic and get the initial diagnosis, while in Group B, the participants went to the normal clinic. Investigators provide the final definite diagnosis from experts for two groups. Investigators compared the accuracy of the diagnosis, time consuming and the satisfaction level between two groups, aiming at comparison of artificial intelligent clinic and normal clinic for diagnosing congenital cataract.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Paediatric patients from collaborating eye clinics Written informed consents provided

Exclusion criteria

  • Definitive diagnosis of cataract or other ocular abnormalities Previous eye surgery Can not cooperate with the slip lamp examination Unwilling to participate in this trail

Treatment and study plan

artificial intelligent clinic

Procedure

Participants in group A assigned to artificial intelligent clinic to get the initial diagnosis after the eye examinations, including images of ocular anterior segment.

normal clinic

Procedure

Participants in group B assigned to normal clinic to get the initial diagnosis after the eye examinations, including images of ocular anterior segment.

experts diagnose

Procedure

After making the initial diagnosis, participants went to get the final definite diagnosis from experts with more than 10 years of clinical experience.

Primary outcomes

  1. The accuracy of artificial intelligence diagnosis for congenital cataract

    Time frame: baseline

    The accuracy of artificial intelligence diagnosis was calculated.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The evaluation of disease severity and treatment determination

    Time frame: baseline

    The accuracy of the evaluation of disease severity and treatment determination was calculated

  2. The time consuming of diagnosis

    Time frame: baseline

    The time consuming of diagnosis was calculated.

  3. The level of patients' satisfaction

    Time frame: baseline

    The information about patients' satisfaction was recorded by using a questionnaire.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sun Yat-sen University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Artificial Intelligent Clinic and Normal Clinic for Diagnosing Congenital Cataracts

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Aug 7, 2017
Registry last updated
Jul 30, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.