Hasan Zaidi
Karachi, Sindh, 75055, Pakistan
NCT Number: NCT03853200
This study was conducted to determine the antibacterial affect of three different solutions used as final irrigant during endodontic therapy. The investigator's objective was to compare the antibacterial affect of relatively new final irrigant QMix with EDTA and Qmix with EDTA+CHX by evaluating the bacteriological status of the root canal before and after use of the final irrigant.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Karachi, Sindh, 75055, Pakistan
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the antibacterial efficacy of Qmix, to 17% EDTA+ Chlorhexidine and 17% EDTA, used as final irrigants, during endodontic procedure.
Endodontic treatment was carried out on 90 necrosed teeth of patients under rubber dam isolation and strict sterilization protocol. The teeth were divided into three groups; A, B and C depending on the type of final irrigant to be used. The chemo-mechanical preparation of all the 90 samples was carried out using ProTaper Universal (Dentsply) File system, and 3% sodium Hypochlorite. All the samples from each group were then irrigated according to the final rinse protocol (FRP). Group A was irrigated with Qmix; Group B with 17% EDTA + 2% Chlorhexidine and Group C (Control group) 17% EDTA.
Three bacteriologic samples were taken during the procedure from each root canal under study in all three groups, using sterile paper points. Sample A was collected after access cavity opening and negotiation of the canal but before chemo-mechanical preparation. Sample B was taken after chemo-mechanical preparation but before the use of the final irrigant. Sample C was collected after the use of final irrigation solution. The samples were collected with sterile paper points and were then transferred to microbiology laboratory in microtubes containing Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth within 2 hours of sample collection for obtaining the colony forming unit (CFU) counts.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endodontic irrigant recommended for final irrigation
Other names: QMIx
two endodontic irrigants will be used in this group in a sequential manner
Other names: EDTA, Chlorhexidine
17% EDTA irrigation solution
Other names: Ethylenediaminetetra acetic acid
Time frame: Before and after use of final irrigant, up to 5 minutes
Change in the Colony forming unit (CFU) of the root canal sample will be assessed by determining the difference between Mean CFU of sample taken before use of final irrigant and sample taken after use of final irrigant.
Dow University of Health Sciences
Other
In-vivo Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Three Different Solutions as Final Irrigant During Endodontic Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05555043
Dental Pulp Diseases, Endodontic Disease
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03635515
Dental Pulp Diseases, Endodontic Disease
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03680534
Dental Pulp Diseases, Endodontic Disease
Bogotá, Colombia
View Trial DetailsNCT03042377
Dental Pulp Diseases, Endodontic Disease
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details