NCT Number: NCT00247715
Comparison of a "Step-Up" Versus a "Step-Down" Treatment Strategy for Patients With New Onset Dyspepsia in General Practice (The DIAMOND-Study)
The purpose of this study was to determine which treatment strategy, the step-up or the step-down treatment strategy, is the most cost-effective treatment for patients with new onset dyspepsia in primary care.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
About this study
Dyspepsia is very common in the population. On an annual basis, 20%-40% of the general population suffers from upper gastrointestinal symptoms. The prevalence of dyspepsia presenting in primary care is about 3%, on average 24% of these patients are referred for secondary care in the same year. In spite of consensus statements and guidelines, the most effective treatment strategy for managing dyspepsia in primary care remains to be determined. In 2000 the Health Council of the Netherlands published some advice for the Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport with special consideration to the most cost-effective strategies for the management of dyspepsia. The Health Counsel Committee agrees in general with the existing guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners to start with empirical treatment. However, the committee concluded that more research is necessary for management of dyspepsia in primary care, especially in uninvestigated patients as most research has been conducted in patients with persistent dyspeptic symptoms referred for secondary care.
Comparison: In this study empirical treatment according to the existing guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners (the step-up treatment strategy) is compared to a step-down treatment strategy. According to this step-down treatment strategy the patient begins treatment with a proton pomp inhibitor, which is an expensive acid-suppressor and is often prescribed by general practitioners.
Step-up strategy: Algeldrate-magnesium oxide, in case of persisting/relapsing symptoms continued with ranitidine, if necessary continued with pantoprazole.
Step-down strategy: Pantoprazole, in case of persisting or relapsing symptoms continued with ranitidine, if necessary continued with algeldrate-magnesium oxide.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Presence of a new episode of dyspepsia, defined as episodic or persistent symptoms including abdominal pain or discomfort and which are, in the opinion of the general practitioner, referable to the upper gastrointestinal tract.
- Over 18 years of age
- Informed consent (written) given.
Exclusion criteria
- Use of prescribed acid suppressive medication during 3 months before consult
- Investigated by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy one year before inclusion
- Malignancy
- Contraindication to the study medication
- Pregnancy
- Alarming symptoms like weight loss, bleeding, and disturbed food passage
- Patients with insufficient comprehension of the Dutch language
Treatment and study plan
Ranitidine
DrugPantoprazole
DrugPrimary outcomes
-
Cost-efficacy
Time frame: 6 months
Secondary outcomes
-
Severity of gastrointestinal symptoms
Time frame: 2 weeks, after each treatment steps, and 6 months
-
Quality of life
Time frame: 2 weeks, after each treatment step, and 6 months
-
Genetic and psychosocial determinants
Time frame: baseline and 6 months
-
Patient compliance after treatment
Time frame: 0 to 6 months
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Other
Collaborators
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
Registry information
Official study title
Comparison of an Antacid/H2-Receptor Antagonist/Proton Pump Inhibitor Versus a Proton Pump Inhibitor/H2-Receptor Antagonist/Antacid Treatment Strategy for Patients With New Onset Dyspepsia in General Practice (The DIAMOND-Study)
Important dates
- Study start
- 2003
- Study completion
- 2007
- First posted
- Nov 2, 2005
- Registry last updated
- Aug 29, 2007
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
fMRI and Visceral Perception Upon Capsaicin Infusion
NCT02551029
Abdominal Pain, Colonic Diseases
Maastricht, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsTraditional Dietary Advice Versus Low FODMAP Diet in Postprandial Functional Dyspepsia
NCT05810168
Digestive System Diseases, Dyspepsia
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsDoes Improving Vagal Tone Increase Mitochondrial Bioenergetics
NCT03931330
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Colonic Diseases
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsICBT for Pain-predominant FGIDs in Children and Adolescents: an Implementation Study.
NCT03252743
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Diseases, Functional
Stockholm, Sweden
View Trial Details