Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00772460

Comparison of a New Patient Warming System Using Polymer Conductive Warming With Forced Air Warming During Surgery

Two patient warming systems will be compared with 40 patients each in a convective warming group (BairHugger, Arizant) and in a conductive warming group (HotDog, Augustine Biomedical).

The patients will undergo small to medium trauma surgery and will be warmed with the randomized device - the hypothesis is, that the area under the standardized core temperature / time curve is significantly greater in the conductive warming group. Secondary outcome is the mean skin temperature / time area under the curve.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Medical University of Vienna

Vienna, State of Vienna, 1090, Austria

About this study

General study design We will study 200 patients (18-90 years) undergoing elective orthopedic surgery at the trauma surgery unit. The patients must have normal weight (20-30 BMI), the duration of surgery should last between 3 - 4 hours. There will be no other exclusion criteria (except severe peripheral arterial disease in the warmed extremity), as forced air patient warming is routinely used for all patients during this procedure.

The patients will be randomly assigned via a computer generated randomization list to treatment with either polymer or forced air warming. Anaesthesia and fluid management will be administered as desired by the anaesthesiologist.

Before warming four skin temperature probes will be attached to the upper arm, chest, abdomen and back of the patients to calculate mean body temperature. A probe (Mallinckrodt Anesthesiology Products, Inc., St. Louis, MO) will be introduced in the ear to measure core temperature. Afterwards, treatment with BairHugger or HotDog will be started.

The measurements will be recorded every five minutes until the end of surgery when intraoperative warming is stopped.

Differences between core temperatures will be analyzed both by using the summary measure of AUC (area under the curve) and by comparing the core-temperature at the end of surgery in the polymer and the forced air group with two-tailed, unpaired t tests if normally distributed and with a Wilcoxon test, if not normally distributed (distribution tested by K-S-test).

Results are expressed as means ± standard deviations if normally distributed, as median (IQ-Range) when not normally distributed.

Differences will be considered statistically significant when P < 0.05. We consider a difference in core temperature at the end of surgery of 0.5°C as clinically important. Considering this difference as well as a known standard deviation of approximately 1.5°C we will have to study 40 patients in each arm of the study to achieve statistical significance using a power of 90% and a p-value of 0.05.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patients must have normal weight (20-30 BMI), the duration of surgery should last between 3 - 4 hours.
  • There will be no other exclusion criteria , as forced air patient warming is routinely used for all patients during this procedure.

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe peripheral artery disease in the warmed extremity

Treatment and study plan

Patient Warming with conductive / convective warming

Device

Warming device set to maximum (43 °C)

Primary outcomes

  1. Area under the standardized "core temperature * time" curve

    Time frame: intraoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Area under "mean skin temperature * time" curve

    Time frame: intraoperatively

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Vienna

Other

Registry information

Acronym: HDV

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Oct 15, 2008
Registry last updated
Sep 21, 2009

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.