Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01075724

Comparison of a New Patient Warming System Using a Polymer Conductive Warming Under-body and Upper-body Blanket With Forced Air Warming

Intraoperative active warming is usually performed by skin warming. There are several forced-air systems on the market; forced air warming is generally described as the most effective yet feasible method of patient warming.

Augustine Biomedical (Eden Prairie, MN, USA) recently introduced a new patient warming system named "Hot Dog" with an active polymer warming upper-body blanket and a new under-body warming mattress. The polymer-heating devices consist of an electronic regulator and the polymer blankets, which are covered with a washable fabric. Conventional mains power the system. The manufacturer claims, that the new system "Hot Dog" (with combination of under body and upper body warming) is as effective as forced air warming, while not having any disadvantages of the forced air system, like: airborne infection, noise, high power consumption and hard-to-clean hose.

The investigators will compare the new Hot Dog patient warming device combination (under body + upper body) with the established warming system, which blows warm air via a mattress over the body of the patients).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Oliver Kimberger

Vienna, State of Vienna, 1090, Austria

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The investigators will study 40 patients (18-90 years) undergoing elective orthopedic lower limb surgery at the trauma surgery unit. The patients must have normal weight (20-30 BMI), the duration of surgery should last between 2 - 3 hours.

Exclusion criteria

  • There will be no other exclusion criteria (except severe peripheral arterial disease in the warmed extremity), as forced air patient warming is routinely used for all patients during this procedure.

Treatment and study plan

Patient Warming with Forced Air

Device

Forced Air warming via BairHugger

Resistive Warming

Device

Resistive Warming via HotDog device

Primary outcomes

  1. Core Temperature at the end of surgery (at time of skin suture)

    Time frame: Single Measurement at Beginning of Skin Suture

Secondary outcomes

  1. Core temperature increase (°C/time)

    Time frame: From Beginning until End of Surgery

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Vienna

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of a New Patient Warming System Using a Polymer Conductive Warming Under-body and Upper-body Blanket With Forced Air Warming During Surgery

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Feb 25, 2010
Registry last updated
Jan 15, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.