T-jet® containing TevTropin®
DeviceNeedle-free delivery method for 14 days before cross-over to other arm
Other names: T-jet®
NCT Number: NCT00990340
The purpose of this study is to obtain psychological response and user preference information on the use of the T jet® device versus the traditional subcutaneous injection administration of Tev Tropin®.
This study will compare subject-reported injection anxiety immediately before the administration of each dose of Tev-Tropin® between a needle-syringe injection method and a needle-free injection method (T-jet®)
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me7 year–17 year
Male
Interventional
Phase 4
The primary efficacy endpoint was the difference in mean subject-reported injection anxiety between the two injection methods as recorded on a 5-point FIS immediately before administration. A higher score denoted greater anxiety.
The injection anxiety score was to be reported by the subject from a row of five faces with values ranging from 5 (the face with the most negative affect) to 1 (the face with the most positive affect).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Needle-free delivery method for 14 days before cross-over to other arm
Other names: T-jet®
comparison of delivery methods for 14 days before cross-over to other arm
Time frame: 28 days; Period 1: 14 days, Period 2: 14 days
The difference in mean subject-reported injection anxiety between the two injection methods as recorded on a 5 point scale immediately before administration, which scale consisted of a row of five faces with values from 1(most positive)to 5(most negative or greater anxiety.) The score is an average of the Period 1 (Days 1-14) and Period 2 (Days 15-28) assessments; like groups were combined and then averaged. There were 3 visits: Visit 1 (Begin Period 1) Screening and Randomized assignment, Visit 2 (first day of Period 2) Cross over to other assignment, Visit 3 End of Study.
Time frame: 28 days; Period 1: 14 days, Period 2: 14 days
The difference in mean subject-reported injection anxiety between the two injection methods as recorded on a 5 point scale immediately before administration, which scale consisted of a row of five faces with values from 1(most positive)to 5(most negative or greater anxiety.) The score is an average of the Period 1 (Days 1-14) and Period 2 (Days 15-28) assessments; like groups were combined and then averaged. There were 3 visits: Visit 1 (Begin Period 1) Screening and Randomized assignment, Visit 2 (first day of Period 2) Cross over to other assignment, Visit 3 End of Study.
Time frame: 2 weeks
The difference in mean subject-reported injection anxiety between the two injection methods as recorded on a 5 point scale immediately before administration, which scale consisted of a row of five faces with values from 1(most positive)to 5(most negative or greater anxiety.) The score is an average of the Period 1 (Days 1-14) and Period 2 (Days 15-28) assessments; like arms were combined and then averaged. There were 3 visits: Visit 1 (Begin Period 1) Screening and Randomized assignment, Visit 2 (first day of Period 2) Cross over to other assignment, Visit 3 End of Study.
Time frame: 28 Days; end of Period 1(14 days) and end of Period 2 (14 days)
The difference in subject-reported overall satisfaction between the two injection methods as recorded on a 5-point scale following the end of each period of the study. The overall satisfaction was to be rated by the subject on a 5-point scale as 1 (Really Unhappy) to 5 (Really Happy), a higher score denoting greater satisfaction. Overall satisfaction is obtained only once at the end of each period; Period 1 Tjet group was added to Period 2 Tjet group and Period 1 syringe group was added to Period 2 syringe group; no averaging was necessary.
Time frame: 28 Days; end of Period 1(14 days) and end of Period 2 (14 days)
The difference in subject-reported overall satisfaction between the two injection methods as recorded on a 5-point scale following the end of each period of the study. The overall satisfaction was to be rated by the subject on a 5-point scale as 1 (Really Unhappy) to 5 (Really Happy), a higher score denoting greater satisfaction. Overall satisfaction is obtained only once at the end of each period; Period 1 Tjet group was added to Period 2 Tjet group and Period 1 syringe group was added to Period 2 syringe group; no averaging was necessary.
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Industry
Study to Compare Injection Anxiety Immediately Before the Administration of Each Dose of Tev-Tropin® Between a Needle-syringe Injection Method and a Needle-free Injection Method in Pediatric Subjects With Human Growth Hormone Deficiency
Acronym: T-jet®
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04615273
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Developmental
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04614337
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Developmental
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05250063
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Developmental
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03422081
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Developmental
Lille, France
View Trial Details