Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04005950

Comparison of a Conventional and a Realistic Self-modified Model

According to the recently published german guidelines for the prehospital airway management regular training for cricothyroidotomy is recommended.

Even though participants prefer animal or cadaver trainingmodels, it is not possible to perform this comprehensive for a large number of participants due to organizational requirements like food hygiene, limited shelf-life and preparation time and expense.

Therefore the investigators modified an available for purchase cricothyroidotomy trainer (the AirSim Combo X) with everyday suitable and cost-effective utensils.

As a control group the investigators used a conventional simple plastic model.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Johannes Gutenberg - Universität

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131, Germany

About this study

Obesity is an important risk factor for a cannot intubate cannot ventilate situation. Obese patients are more likely to require a cricothyroidotomy, due to failure rates of routine airway management. Relevant landmarks can be difficult to palpate. And the greater depth of the soft tissues overlying the larynx. Due to this reasons the investigators modified the adult intubation manikin AirSim Combo X with a drunk baby diaper to simulate the neck of an obese patient.

As a further modification the investigators prepared freezer bags filled with faked blood to simulate a possible bleeding.

35 medial doctors of the department of anesthesiology and 35 paramedics are going to perform two cricothyroidotomies in each model.

For the one time participants use the ScalpelCric Set and for the other time participants use the ScalpelCric Set plus a speculum.

Primary endpoint is the evaluation of reality of the two different manikins.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • written informed consent
  • german language in speaking and writing
  • capability of giving consent

Exclusion criteria

  • participants unwilling or unable to give informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Scalpel Bougie technique

Device

ScalpelCric Set

modified Scalpel Bougie technique

Device

ScalpelCric Set plus speculum

Primary outcomes

  1. evaluation of realistic applicability

    Time frame: 12 minutes

    using Likert scale (1=very realistic, 2= realistic, 3= not very realistic, 4=unrealistic)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time from initial handling equipment to a successful placement of the tracheal cannula

    Time frame: 300 seconds

Other outcomes

  1. Number of trials

    Time frame: up to 12 minutes

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation and Comparison of a Modified Skalpell-Bougie-technique for Cricothyreotomie: Comparison of a Conventional and a Realistic Self-modified Model

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Jul 2, 2019
Registry last updated
Jul 23, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.