Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01180049

Comparison Of 2 Doses Of Temsirolimus (Torisel) In Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma

This study will compare the effectiveness and safety of two different doses of temsirolimus (Torisel).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have confirmed mantle cell lymphoma diagnosis.
  • Have measurable disease.
  • Have received at least 2 prior treatment, which may include stem cell transplant.
  • Have adequate organ and bone marrow function.
  • There are other criteria--please discuss with your doctor.

Exclusion criteria

  • Had any prior treatment with temsirolimus or mTOR inhibitor.
  • Had allogeneic stem cell transplant within last 6 months and on immunosuppressive therapy.
  • Has active or untreated brain or central nervous system metastases.
  • There are other criteria--please discuss with your doctor.

Treatment and study plan

temsirolimus

Drug

175mg IV once a week for first 3 weeks, followed by 75mg IV once a week until disease progression, provided that patient is tolerating treatment and getting clinical benefit

Other names: Torisel

Primary outcomes

  1. Independently Assessed Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: From randomization date to the date of first documentation of progression or death (average follow up done for 15 months)

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to first documentation of disease progression by the independent assessor or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

    PFS = (earliest date of progression or death due to any cause- randomization date+1)/30.4.

    PFS assessment was done using EMA guidelines for sensitivity analysis censoring.

    Participants who were alive and progression-free at the time of analysis were censored on the date of last assessment; participants without adequate baseline assessment or without post-baseline assessments were censored on the randomization date; participants who died or progressed after 2 or more missed visits were censored on the date of last tumor assessment prior to the missing visit; and participants who started new anti-cancer therapy prior to death or progression were censored on the date of last tumor assessment prior to the start of anti-tumor treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: From randomization date until death due to any cause (average follow up done for 56.1 months)

    OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.

  2. Independent Assessment - Objective Response Rate (ORR = CR + PR)

    Time frame: From randomization date until end of treatment (average follow up done for 15 months)

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed CR or PR according to the Cheson Criteria relative to all randomized Participants. Tumor responses were determined using information from objective measurements from computed tomography information including B-symptom evaluation, physical examination, ECOG performance status, assessment of liver and spleen, laboratory assessments such as bone marrow biopsies and/or aspirates, biochemical markers of disease activity and hematology results.

    Participants who did not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation or who died, progressed or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the (CT) scans, as well as clinical assessment of ORR.

  3. Investigator's Assessment ORR (ORR = CR + PR)

    Time frame: From randomization date until end of treatment (average follow up done for 15 months)

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed CR or PR according to the Cheson Criteria relative to all randomized Participants. Tumor responses were determined using information from objective measurements from computed tomography information including B-symptom evaluation, physical examination, ECOG performance status, assessment of liver and spleen, laboratory assessments such as bone marrow biopsies and/or aspirates, biochemical markers of disease activity and hematology results.

    Participants who did not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation or who died, progressed or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the (CT) scans, as well as clinical assessment of ORR.

  4. Investigator Assessed PFS

    Time frame: From randomization date to the date of first documentation of progression or death (average follow up done for 15 months)

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to first documentation of disease progression by the independent assessor or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

    PFS = (earliest date of progression or death due to any cause- randomization date+1)/30.4.

    PFS assessment was done using EMA guidelines for sensitivity analysis censoring.

    Participants who were alive and progression-free at the time of analysis were censored on the date of last assessment; participants without adequate baseline assessment or without post-baseline assessments were censored on the randomization date; participants who died or progressed after 2 or more missed visits were censored on the date of last tumor assessment prior to the missing visit; and participants who started new anti-cancer therapy prior to death or progression were censored on the date of last tumor assessment prior to the start of anti-tumor treatment.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Infection- Related Adverse Events (AEs) With Grade 2 or Higher as Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)

    Time frame: From screening up to a maximum of 57.1 months

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment emergent adverse event=as an event that emerged during treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during treatment period relative to pretreatment state. Treatment-emergent infection-related AEs included events: pneumonia, bronchitis, infection, herpes simplex, oral candidiasis and sepsis. Grading by NCI CTCAE Version 3.0.: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe; Grade 4= life-threatening; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Bleeding-Related AEs With Grade 2 or Higher as Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)

    Time frame: From screening up to a maximum of 57.1 months

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment emergent adverse event=as an event that emerged during treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during treatment period relative to pretreatment state. Treatment-emergent bleeding related AEs included events: epistaxis and ecchymosis. AE were assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03.Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; within normal limits. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death.

  7. Quantify the Potential Effect of TEMSR on AUC and Cmax

    Time frame: From one week predose (Day -7, -4hr, -8hr, -48hr) upto 2 weeks post dose (4hr, 8hr, 48hr and Day 8)

    Potential TEMSR effects were investigated by calculating the ratio of AUCs with and without concomitant TEMSR from the model-estimated effect of TEMSR on apparent clearance (CL/F) values and using individual ratios of observed Cmax values with and without concomitant temsirolimus, for both parent and metabolite. The AUC mean ratio was calculated as 1 / mean shift on apparent clearance from TEMSR, and the 90% CI of the AUC ratios was calculated as 1 / 90% CI of the shift on apparent clearance from TEMSR.

    AUC: Area under plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity Cmax: Characterization of maximum observed plasma concentration

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A RANDOMIZED PHASE 4 STUDY COMPARING 2 INTRAVENOUS TEMSIROLIMUS (TEMSR) REGIMENS IN SUBJECTS WITH RELAPSED, REFRACTORY MANTLE CELL LYMPHOMA

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2018
First posted
Aug 11, 2010
Registry last updated
May 20, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.