Background:
Colorectal cancer is the most frequent neoplasm and the second cause of cancer death in Spain. Colon cleansing is critical for visualization of lesions at colonoscopy. High-quality cleansing allows for correct detection and resection of all lesions and may contribute to adequate risk stratification and follow-up interval.
Low-volume laxatives improve tolerance of the colonoscopy preparation without reducing its effectiveness. Currently, the most widely used low-volume laxatives are one liter of Polyethylene glycol + ascorbate (PEG1A) and sodium picosulfate + magnesium citrate (PSCM).
The evidence on the comparison of laxatives to achieve a high-quality colonic cleansing is very scarce.
Hypothesis:
Polyethylene glycol 1 liter with ascorbate is superior to sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate in high-quality colon cleansing.
Objective:
Overall objective:
To compare the global high-quality cleansing frequency between the two laxatives using the Harefield Scale (HS).
The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority in global high-quality cleansing of PEG1A compared to PSCM. If non-inferiority is demonstrated, superiority of PEG1A will be analyzed.
Specific objectives:
* Frequency of global high-quality cleansing using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).
* Frequency of adequate-quality cleansing using the HS and BBPS scales.
* Tolerance and adverse effects of both laxatives.
* Detection of lesions, total adenomas, advanced adenomas, total serrated lesions, advanced serrated lesions and colorectal cancer.
* Detection of neoplastic lesions in the different colon segments (proximal, transverse, descending, sigmoid and rectum).
* Association between detected lesions and the quality of the preparation, according to the HS and BBPS scales.
Methods:
Phase 4, multi-centric, randomized, single-blind (endoscopist), parallel study with two treatment arms: PEG1A (Pleinvue®) and PSCM (Citrafleet®).