Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01122693

Comparison Between Two Ultrasound Technologies for Ultrasound-guided Catheter Placement in Regional Anesthesia

The use of ultrasound imaging techniques in regional anaesthesia is rapidly becoming an area of increasing interest. It represents one of the largest changes that the field of regional anaesthesia has seen. For the first time, the operator is able to view an image of the target nerve directly, guide the needle under real-time observation, navigate away from sensitive anatomy, and monitor the spread of local anaesthetic (LA).The key to successful regional anaesthesia is deposition of LA accurately around the nerve structures.

In the past, electrical stimulation which relied on surface landmark identification, was used for this. However, landmark techniques have limitations; variations in anatomy and nerve physiology , as well as equipment accuracy have had an effect on success rates and complications.

However, alongside the enthusiasm of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia, there should be a degree of informed scepticism. The widespread use of the various techniques of ultrasound-guided regional blocks without adequate training raises the danger of malpractice and subsequent impaired outcome.

Adequate education in the use of regional block techniques under ultrasound guidance is essential. Recent technical developments have achieved higher ultrasound frequencies and better image resolution, as well as better post-processing and user-friendliness.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether new technical features such as reference images, higher ultrasound frequencies, better image resolution and smaller size and weight of the ultrasound probes may improve outcome (clinical benefits) and may show an increased efficacy and safety. And if the new technology of ultrasound images improves the training quality of trainees and novices in the art of ultrasound-guided blocks.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Anesthesia

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients at the age of 18 and above who need a regional anesthesia catheter for postoperative pain management after elective orthopedic surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • Participation in another trial according to the German Drug Law 30 days to and during the study
  • Lacking willingness to save and hand out data within the study
  • Accommodation in an institution due to an official or judicial order
  • (Unclear) history of alcohol or substances disabuse
  • Absent knowledge of German language
  • Analphabetism
  • Allergy to local anesthesia or other ingredients of the intravenous solutions
  • For women: Pregnancy or positive pregnancy test within the preoperative screening
  • Operation due to case of emergency, polytrauma or pathologic fracture
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification greater than III
  • Peripheral or central edema
  • AIDS (according to the CDC-classification of HIV-infection: category C)
  • Immunosuppression therapy
  • History of bleeding tendency (e.g. von-Willebrand-disease, thrombocytopenia)
  • Derailed metabolic disorder (e.g. Diabetes mellitus (Glucose > 300 mg/dl) during the preoperative screening)
  • Known history of electrolyte disturbance (e.g. Hyperkalemia > 5.8 mmol/l, Hypernatraemia > 155 mmol/l)
  • Known history of acid-base-dysbalances
  • History of intracranial hemorrhage within one year of participation in the study
  • Neurological or psychiatric disease with limited contractual capability
  • CHF (congestive heart failure) according to (New York Heart Association) classification - NYHA class IV
  • Liver disease (CHILD B or C cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease (MELD-score greater than 10)
  • Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dl or greater than 150 µmol/l or dependency of haemodialysis)

Treatment and study plan

eZono - high-quality 2D ultrasound images

Device

higher ultrasound frequencies, better image resolution, better post-processing and user-friendliness.

standard 2D ultrasound images

Device

current standard in two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound images

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction in time to perform the catheter placement in regional anesthesia

    Time frame: first three days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvement in performance: Incidence of complications

    Time frame: first three days

  2. Improvement of success rate regarding correct catheter placement

    Time frame: first three days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Between Two Ultrasound Technologies for Ultrasound-guided Catheter Placement in Regional Anesthesia

Acronym: eZono

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
May 13, 2010
Registry last updated
Feb 4, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.