Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01573975

Comparison Between Ten Days Sequential Treatment and Traditional Three Combined Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori

The purpose of this study is to compare the eradication efficacy of 10-day triple therapy with 10-day sequential therapy with tetracycline or metronidazole.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–95 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital

Hualien City, Taiwan, 97002

About this study

Background: Antimicrobial resistance has decreased eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori infection worldwide.

Objective: To determine whether sequential treatment eradicates H. pylori infection better than standard triple-drug therapy for adults with dyspepsia or peptic ulcers in Taiwanese people.

Design: Randomized, single-blind, prospective controlled trial. Setting: A large tertiary referral hospital in eastern Taiwan. Patients: 450 patients with dyspepsia or peptic ulcers and infected by H. pylori.

Measurements: 13C-urea breath test, upper endoscopy, histologic evaluation, rapid urease test, bacterial culture, assessment of antibiotic resistance and CYP2C19 genotype of host.

Intervention: 450 patients with H. pylori infection are randomly assigned to receive one of the following therapeutic schemes: group A (5RA5RCT): rabeprazole (20 mg bid) plus amoxicillin (1 g bid) for 5 days, followed by rabeprazole (20 mg bid) plus clarithromycin (500 mg bid) and tetracycline (1g bid) for a further 5 days; group B (5RA5RCM): rabeprazole (20 mg bid) plus amoxicillin (1 g bid) for 5 days, followed by rabeprazole (20 mg bid) plus clarithromycin (500 mg bid) and metronidazole (500mg bid) for a further 5 days; group C as control: rabeprazole (20 mg bid) plus amoxicillin (1 g bid) and clarithromycin (500 mg bid.) for 10 days.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • patient proved with infection of H. pylori in gastric mucosa
  • adult with signed inform consent

Exclusion criteria

  • woman in breast feeding or pregnancy.
  • allergy to drugs used in study.
  • three months without use of any antibiotic agents.
  • patients under 20 years old.

Treatment and study plan

5RA-5RCM

Drug

rabeprazole 20mg b.i.d + amoxicillin 1000mg b.i.d x 5 days + rabeprazole 20mg b.i.d + clarithromycin 500mg b.i.d + metronidazole 500mg b.i.d x last 5 days.

Other names: Pariet x 10 days, Hiconcil x 1st 5 days then, Klaricid x last 5 days +, Flagyl x last 5 days

5RA-5RCT

Drug

rabeprazole 20mg b.i.d + amoxicillin 1000mg b.i.d x 5 days + rabeprazole 20mg b.i.d + clarithromycin 500mg b.i.d + tetracycline 1000mg b.i.d x last 5 days.

Other names: Pariet x 10 days, Hiconcil x 1st 5 days then, Klaricid x last 5 days +, Acromycin x last 5 days.

10RCA

Drug

rabeprazole 20mg b.i.d + clarithromycin 500mg b.i.d + amoxicillin 1000mg b.i.d x 10 days.

Other names: Pariet x 10 days, Klaricid x 10 days, Hiconcil x 10 days.

Primary outcomes

  1. Eradication rate

    Time frame: 4 weeks after complete use of drug for treatment

    A negative post-treatment 13C-urea breath test or CLO test result at more than 4 weeks after complete use of drug for treatment

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison Between Ten Days Sequential Treatment (With Metronidazole or Tetracycline) and Ten Days Standard Triple Therapy of Helicobacter Pylori

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Apr 10, 2012
Registry last updated
Apr 10, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.