Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06770192

Comparison Between Plyometrics and Calisthenics on Executive Function in School Going Children

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of calisthenics and plyometric exercises on executive functions in school-going children. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Will calisthenics exercises have a better effect on executive functions compared to plyometric exercises in school-going children? * How do these exercise interventions impact selective attention, working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility in children?

Researchers will compare a calisthenics exercise group, a plyometric exercise group, and a control group (no intervention) to see if there are differences in executive function outcomes.

Participants will:

* Be male school-going children aged 8-12 years * Be randomly assigned to one of three groups: calisthenics, plyometric, or control * Complete baseline assessments of executive function * Participate in their assigned exercise program 3 times per week for 8 weeks (exercise groups only) * Complete follow-up assessments of executive function at 4 weeks and 8 weeks * Perform tests measuring selective attention, working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

8 year–12 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Different Schools

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46000, Pakistan

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Waqar Ahmed Awan Principal Investigator, phD

CONTACT

[email protected]

0923335348846

About this study

Title: Comparison of Calisthenics and Plyometric Exercises on Executive Functions Among School-Going Children

This research study, conducted by Maria Javid at Riphah International University in Islamabad, aims to investigate how different types of exercise affect cognitive abilities in children. Specifically, it compares the effects of calisthenics (bodyweight exercises) and plyometrics (jump training) on executive functions in school-going children.

Executive functions are crucial cognitive skills that help children with tasks like planning, organizing, paying attention, and controlling impulses. These skills are essential for academic success and everyday life. The study seeks to understand if and how different exercise types can enhance these cognitive abilities.

Key Details:

  • Participants: Male school-going children aged 8-12 years
  • Duration: 8 weeks
  • Location: Public and private schools in Islamabad, Pakistan

The study will involve three groups:

  • Calisthenics group: Performing bodyweight exercises
  • Plyometric group: Engaging in jumping and explosive movement exercises
  • Control group: No specific exercise intervention

Both exercise groups will participate in supervised sessions three times per week. The exercises are designed to be age-appropriate and safe for children.

Measurements:

Researchers will assess various aspects of executive function using standardized tests:

  • Selective attention: Using the Children's Trail Making Test
  • Working memory: Using Forward and Backward Digit Span Tests
  • Inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility: Using the Stroop Test

These assessments will be conducted at the beginning of the study, at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks to track changes over time.

Significance:

This study is important because it could provide valuable insights into how different types of exercise affect children's cognitive development. The results could inform physical education programs in schools and help parents and educators make informed decisions about children's physical activities.

Ethical Considerations:

The study has been approved by the university's ethics review board. Participation is voluntary, and parents must provide informed consent. All data will be kept confidential and coded to protect participants' identities.

Expected Outcomes:

The researchers hypothesize that calisthenics exercises may have a more significant positive effect on executive functions compared to plyometric exercises. However, both exercise types are expected to show improvements compared to the control group.

This research contributes to the growing field of exercise neuroscience and could have practical implications for child development, education, and public health policies related to physical activity in schools.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants falling in this category would be recruited into the study.
  • Male School Going Children (8-12 Years of Age)
  • Normal BMI of School Going Children
  • No Recent Musculoskeletal Injury.
  • Not Actively Engaged in Other Sports

Exclusion criteria

  • Children with any mental or physical disability.
  • Children with acute illness or fracture
  • Active Inflammation or infections
  • Any physical deformity

Treatment and study plan

Calisthenics

Other

Session will start with 9 minutes of warm up which includes 4 minutes of jogging and moderate intensity dynamic stretching for 5 minutes. Session would be of 8 minutes in which 1 minutes exercise and 1 minute rest is there. Exercise include bunny jumps, bear crawls , crab walk and mad cat and 9 minutes cool down period. This protocol would be follow up to 8 weeks.

Plyometric

Other

: Session will start with 9 minutes of warm up which includes 4 minutes of jogging and moderate intensity dynamic stretching for 5 minutes.. And 9 minutes cool down period. Following Plyometrics would be performed:1 medicine ball squats 2.ABC pushups 3.Medicine ball chest press 4.standing jump reach for star 5.SINGLE leg hops 6.Pushup on knees 7.zig zag double jump

Control

Other

compare with other groups

Primary outcomes

  1. Selective Attention

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    which is measured by Children's Trail Making Test (Parts 1 and 2).Part 1: This test assesses the child's ability to maintain focused attention by having them connect numbered circles in sequential order as quickly as possible. It measures visual attention and task-switching capabilities.

    Part 2: In this part, the child alternates between numbers and letters (e.g., 1-A-2-B), which adds a layer of complexity to assess cognitive flexibility and visual-motor coordination.

  2. Forward Digit Span

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    Measures the ability to temporarily hold and recall sequences of numbers in the same order they are presented, assessing short-term memory

  3. Backward Digit Span

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    Requires the child to recall sequences of numbers in reverse order, testing their working memory and cognitive processing capabilities.

  4. Digit Sequencing

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    Involves recalling a series of digits in numerical order, further assessing the ability to manipulate and reorganize information in working memory

  5. Inhibitory Control and Cognitive Flexibility

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    tested by Stroop Test This test evaluates the child's ability to inhibit automatic responses and demonstrate cognitive flexibility. In the classic Stroop task, the child must name the ink color of words that are incongruent with their meaning (e.g., the word "red" printed in blue ink). It measures how well the child can control their impulsive responses and manage conflicting information.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Waqar Ahmed Awan Phd

CONTACT

[email protected]

+923335348846

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Plyometrics and Calisthenics on Executive Function in School Going Children

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jan 13, 2025
Registry last updated
Jan 13, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.