Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00566683

Comparison Between Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation and Diazemuls / Pethidine in Outpatient Colonoscopy

Colonoscopy is a common endoscopic procedure as an investigation of colorectal pathology. Different modalities of pain control have been described in the past. Propofol is a perfect drug for endoscopic procedure since it has the characteristic of fast onset, short half-life and early recovery. Its unfamiliarity and its potential cardiovascular and respiratory side effect make it unpopular to endoscopists. Recent reports showed propofol is safe in bolus titration by nurse in Caucasian in all endoscopic procedures. Our previous pilot study showed nurse administered propofol sedation (NAPS) is effective and safe and highly acceptable by Chinese patients. Here we conduct a randomized controlled study to compare the effectiveness of NAPS versus traditional sedation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65 undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy

Exclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologist Class III or above
  • History of difficult endotracheal intubation
  • Known allergy to propofol, eggs or soy products, opioid, benzodiazepines
  • previous colectomy

Treatment and study plan

diazemuls, pethidine

Drug

5mg Diazemuls and 25mg Pethidine one min. before procedure followed by bolus doses of 2.5mg Diazemuls / 12.5mg Pethidine at the discretion of endoscopists Maximal dose of 0.2mg/kg Diazemuls and 1mg/kg Pethidine

Propofol and Alfentanil

Drug

Loading dose of 40-60mg or 0.8mg/kg Propofol one min. before procedure Propofol 200mg + Alfentanil 0.5mg, 1.5ml per bolus (bolus dose of 14.3mg Propofol + 35ug Alfentanil) via PCA pump No maximal dose Zero lockout time

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain

    Time frame: after recovery

Secondary outcomes

  1. sedation

    Time frame: thorughout the procedure

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

North District Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation by PCA Pump Versus Diazemuls / Pethidine in Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Important dates

Study start
2005
Study completion
2006
First posted
Dec 3, 2007
Registry last updated
Dec 3, 2007

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.