Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03299868

Comparison Between Initial Routine PICC and General IV Access in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients

To establish the IV access strategy for terminally ill cancer patients, using comparisons of the safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction between the initially routine PICC insertion group (routine PICC group) and general IV access group (optional PICC group).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, South Korea

About this study

Reliable intravenous (IV) access is an important issue in terminally ill cancer patients, however, they have limited or no peripheral venous access due to edema or long period of IV therapy. Thus, intravenous access has been provided by Central venous catheter (CVC).

There are some options for applying CVC in cancer patients; subclavian venous catheter (SVC), chemo-port (CP), and the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC).

When considering the characteristics of terminally ill cancer patients, such as poor general condition and a limited period of survival, PICC could be a safe and effective method for intravenous access.

There are two previous studies concerned about PICC study in terminally ill cancer patients. They showed that PICC might be overall safe and efficient in terminally ill cancer patients. However, these studies did not evaluate superiority of PICC insertion compared to no insertion and the appropriate time for PICC insertion due to limitation of their design, such as retrospective or single-arm observational study. Thus, strategies of PICC insertion for IV access in terminally ill cancer patients have not been determined until now.

Considering the favorable results of PICC insertion in previous studies and limited survival time of terminally ill cancer patients, the investigator postulated that routine PICC insertion at the time of admission for terminal care would be effective for IV access.

Thus, the investigator assumed that initially routine PICC insertion would be non-inferior in maintenance success rate / and complication rate compared to general IV access. In addition, it would be superior in patient-perceived satisfaction. The inveistigator will undertake a randomized phase II study to confirm the hypothesis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Cancer patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed malignancy and fulfilled all of the following conditions
  • Patients with expected survival time of 3 months or less due to a progressive disease without additional anticancer treatment. (However, palliative radiation treatment for symptom control is allowed.)
  • Patients who need the IV access route continuously for hydration or medication.
  • Age18 or older
  • Signed and dated informed consent of document indicating that the patient (or legally acceptable representative) has been informed about all pertinent aspects of the trial prior to enrollment

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who showed severe coagulopathy such as thrombocytopenia (Platelet count ≤ 20,000/mm2) or international normalized ratio (INR) prolongation (≥2.0 ) in spite of treatment
  • Patients who have an evidence of current sepsis (bacteremia or fungemia)
  • 'current' means bacteremia/fungemia without eradication on follow-up peripheral blood culture
  • patients with persistent fever (bacteremia or fungemia cannot be ruled out)
  • Patients who is impracticable to PICC insertion due to uncontrolled behavioral disorders

Treatment and study plan

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)

Device

comparisons of the safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction between the initially routine PICC insertion group (routine PICC group) and general IV access group (general IV group)

Primary outcomes

  1. IV access maintenance success rate

    Time frame: From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years

    rate of successful PICC maintenance until death or discharge/transfer

Secondary outcomes

  1. PICC related complication rate

    Time frame: From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years

    rate of any complication which is related with PICC

  2. PICC premature removal rate

    Time frame: From date of enrollment until date of PICC removal, assess up to 2 years

    rate of premature removal such as self-removal or CRBSI before death or discharge

  3. PICC life span

    Time frame: From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years

    median survival of PICC

  4. patient perceived procedure-related distress

    Time frame: 5th day after procedure

    procedure-related distress during insertion of PICC

  5. patient perceived comfort and convenience assessed by a newly developed question in this study

    Time frame: 3th to 7th day after enrollment

    patient perceived comfort and convenience ("How do participants feel comfort and convenience about the IV access?" at 3th - 7th days after enrollment

  6. colonization of microbiology in PICC

    Time frame: at the time of PICC removal, assess up to 2 years

    Investigator evaluate the colonization of PICC using tip culture at the time of removal

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Safety, Efficacy, and Patient-perceived Satisfaction Between Initial Routine Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Insertion and General Intravenous Access in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Randomized Phase II Study

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Oct 3, 2017
Registry last updated
Aug 25, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.