Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT03299868
To establish the IV access strategy for terminally ill cancer patients, using comparisons of the safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction between the initially routine PICC insertion group (routine PICC group) and general IV access group (optional PICC group).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, South Korea
Reliable intravenous (IV) access is an important issue in terminally ill cancer patients, however, they have limited or no peripheral venous access due to edema or long period of IV therapy. Thus, intravenous access has been provided by Central venous catheter (CVC).
There are some options for applying CVC in cancer patients; subclavian venous catheter (SVC), chemo-port (CP), and the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC).
When considering the characteristics of terminally ill cancer patients, such as poor general condition and a limited period of survival, PICC could be a safe and effective method for intravenous access.
There are two previous studies concerned about PICC study in terminally ill cancer patients. They showed that PICC might be overall safe and efficient in terminally ill cancer patients. However, these studies did not evaluate superiority of PICC insertion compared to no insertion and the appropriate time for PICC insertion due to limitation of their design, such as retrospective or single-arm observational study. Thus, strategies of PICC insertion for IV access in terminally ill cancer patients have not been determined until now.
Considering the favorable results of PICC insertion in previous studies and limited survival time of terminally ill cancer patients, the investigator postulated that routine PICC insertion at the time of admission for terminal care would be effective for IV access.
Thus, the investigator assumed that initially routine PICC insertion would be non-inferior in maintenance success rate / and complication rate compared to general IV access. In addition, it would be superior in patient-perceived satisfaction. The inveistigator will undertake a randomized phase II study to confirm the hypothesis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
comparisons of the safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction between the initially routine PICC insertion group (routine PICC group) and general IV access group (general IV group)
Time frame: From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years
rate of successful PICC maintenance until death or discharge/transfer
Time frame: From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years
rate of any complication which is related with PICC
Time frame: From date of enrollment until date of PICC removal, assess up to 2 years
rate of premature removal such as self-removal or CRBSI before death or discharge
Time frame: From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years
median survival of PICC
Time frame: 5th day after procedure
procedure-related distress during insertion of PICC
Time frame: 3th to 7th day after enrollment
patient perceived comfort and convenience ("How do participants feel comfort and convenience about the IV access?" at 3th - 7th days after enrollment
Time frame: at the time of PICC removal, assess up to 2 years
Investigator evaluate the colonization of PICC using tip culture at the time of removal
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Other
Comparison of Safety, Efficacy, and Patient-perceived Satisfaction Between Initial Routine Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Insertion and General Intravenous Access in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Randomized Phase II Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04263649
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter
Klagenfurt, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT02409589
Intracavitary Electrocardiogram Guiding, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07209670
CLABSI - Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter
View Trial DetailsNCT04135547
Cardiovascular Diseases, Emergency Medical Service
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial Details