Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05533723

Comparison Between Endoscopic Epidural Neuroplasty and Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty in Low Back and Radicular Pain

PEN(percutaneous epidural neuroplasty) can be performed percutaneously, may be manipulated to mechanically break up adhesions by catheter, while various agents, such as anesthetics, corticosteroids, hyaluronidase, and hypertonic saline are injected. In endoscopic epidural neuroplasty (EEN), a flexible catheter is inserted into the sacral hiatus to precisely place the injection in the epidural space and onto the nerve root. Both EEN and PEN can eliminate the deleterious effects of scar formation, which can physically prevent the direct application of drugs to the nerves, and may provide pain relief in patients who have not responded to epidural blocks, physical therapy, or medication. In this study, visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) of patients with low back and radicular pain were compared in patients who had received EEN or PEN at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after EEN or PEN.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Low back pain and lumbar radicular pain commonly occur in degenerative spondy-losis. Low back and radicular pain have many underlying causes, one of which is scar-ring in the epidural space, which can cause pain for many reasons. The nerves may be trapped by scars, while the congestive veins in the epidural space can become enlarged and exert pressure upon the nerves.

Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) with a wire type catheter, first reported by Dr. Racz, has been widely practiced since 1989, and reduces pain by epidural adhesiolysis, epidural fibrosis and inflammation near the neural tissue.

The PEN procedure is used to dissolve some scar tissue around the entrapped nerves in the epidural space of the spine. PEN can be performed percutaneously, using a Racz catheter. The catheter may be manipulated to mechanically break up adhesions, while various agents, such as anesthetics, corticosteroids, hyaluronidase, and hypertonic saline are injected. In endoscopic epidural neuroplasty (EEN), a flexible catheter is inserted into the sacral hiatus to precisely place the injection in the epidural space and onto the nerve root. Both EEN and PEN can eliminate the deleterious effects of scar formation, which can physically prevent the direct application of drugs to the nerves, and may pro-vide pain relief in patients who have not responded to epidural blocks, physical therapy, or medication.

In this study, visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) of pa-tients with low back and radicular pain were compared in patients who had received EEN or PEN at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after EEN or PEN.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • age over 20 years
  • low back or radicular pain in the low extremities
  • persistent low back or radicular pain

Exclusion criteria

  • systemic infection
  • skin infection at the injection site
  • uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • coagulation abnormalities
  • history of allergic reactions to local anesthetics or contrast agents

Treatment and study plan

Endoscopic epidural neuroplasty

Procedure

EEN catheter, iDolphine S2 (Meta Biomed Co., Ltd, Osong, Korea) was placed in the epidural space through sacral hiatus. EEN was done on the target segments.

During EEN, normal saline was infused into epidural space under epiduroscopic vision. Dexamethasone (5 mg), 0.3% mepivacaine 10 mL, and hyaluronidase (3000 IU) were injected through catheter at the target segments. Holmium-Yag laser was used to cut epidural fibrous bands and for coagulation of epidural bleeding.

Other names: Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN)

Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN)

Procedure

PEN catheter, EDEN-CC (JMT, Yangju, Korea) was placed in the epidural space and neural foramen . PEN was done on the target segments. Dexamethasone (5 mg), 0.3% mepivacaine 10 ml, and hyaluronidase (3000 IU) were injected through the PEN catheter.

Primary outcomes

  1. visual analog scale

    Time frame: 6 months after EEN or PEN

    11 points pain scale score from 0 to 10

  2. Oswestry disability index

    Time frame: 6 months after EEN or PEN

    disability index from 0 to 100%

Secondary outcomes

  1. weight

    Time frame: before EEN or PEN

    kg

  2. height

    Time frame: before EEN or PEN

    m

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ajou University School of Medicine

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison Between Endoscopic Epidural Neuroplasty and Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty With a Steering Catheter in Low Back and Radicular Pain

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Sep 9, 2022
Registry last updated
Sep 9, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.