Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06801327

Comparison Between Conventional Respiratory Physiotherapy and the Simeox Device in Patients With Bronchiectasis

Physiotherapy is a key treatment for patients with bronchiectasis. An evaluation of the parameters indicative of respiratory health in patients treated with two different respiratory physiotherapy techniques (conventional versus Simeox®) would be very useful in choosing physiotherapy treatments for bronchiectasis patients. A systematic review of the literature shows that there are no published studies evaluating the effectiveness of respiratory physiotherapy by analyzing the variation in resistance measured using the forced oscillation technique (FOT) in patients with bronchiectasis. The results of this study would add to those that have examined different physiotherapy techniques and could therefore contribute to the choice of the most appropriate technique for this category of patients.

The trial is being conducted to answer the question: "How do respiratory parameters vary during treatment with two different respiratory physiotherapy techniques: conventional respiratory physiotherapy or that performed using the Simeox device?" Secondary objectives include the measurement of various functional parameters, such as vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, blood oxygenation, blood pressure values) and spirometry values (FEV1, FVC, TLC). The onset of adverse events, the degree of patient tolerance and relief, and respiratory health will also be assessed through the administration of various questionnaires commonly used in clinical practice. Additionally, changes in the quantity of sputum produced will be measured.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Respiratory and Critical Care Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna

Bologna, 40138, Italy

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Stefano Nava, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Stefano Nava, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vittoria Comellini, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Vittoria Comellini, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Single-center, prospective, open-label, 2x2 randomized crossover study. It is planned to consecutively enroll all outpatient patients who attend the bronchiectasis clinic of the Pneumology and Respiratory Intensive Care Unit of the IRCCS, University Hospital of Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola. The study has a 2x2 crossover design for superiority. Each enrolled patient will undergo two treatment periods, each lasting 4 weeks. Patients randomized to Group A will undergo the first treatment with conventional respiratory physiotherapy techniques (usually with Acapella, PEEP bottle, PEP mask, according to current clinical-assistance practice at our clinic), while patients randomized to Group B will start treatment with the Simeox® device.

At the end of the first 4 weeks, the treatment will be interrupted, and a 1-week wash-out period will be observed. Based on what is commonly observed in clinical practice, it is believed that 1 week of wash-out is adequate time for mucus to re-accumulate in the airways and restore the baseline conditions necessary for the crossover, while also avoiding the risk of adverse events due to mucus accumulation. At the end of the wash-out week, the second phase of the study will begin, also lasting 4 weeks, with a treatment switch: Group A patients will use the Simeox® device, and Group B patients will undergo conventional respiratory physiotherapy.

Randomization will be conducted with a 1:1 ratio without stratification by the statisticians of the Research and Innovation Unit of the IRCCS AOUBO using statistical software. The randomization list will be entered into the study's eCRF, created with REDCap, and will be consulted by the investigators at each new enrollment. Treatment arm assignment will be performed at V1.

If the enrolled patients are already undergoing respiratory physiotherapy, they will be subjected to a 1-week wash-out period before starting the study, during which respiratory physiotherapy will be suspended. The Investigators will not include patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) in the study, as the production of bronchial secretions in this group of patients is substantial. In patients with bronchiectasis not due to CF, however, secretion production is generally much more modest, and, as done in other studies, a short wash-out period does not significantly increase risks for these patients. For greater caution, the study will only be proposed to patients in a stable phase (absence of ongoing exacerbations) and with sputum production < 200 mL/day (comparable to 1 plastic cup). These are the criteria by which, in clinical judgment, "non-strongly secretive" patients are identified. During the wash-out period, patients will be invited to contact us immediately if sputum production exceeds 200 mL/day, in which case the investigators will exclude the patient from the study and arrange a short-term visit.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a diagnosis of bronchiectasis not due to cystic fibrosis who are not hospitalized.
  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Evidence of bronchiectasis in at least one lung lobe from a chest CT scan performed within the 10 years prior to enrollment.
  • Absence of exacerbations in the 28 days preceding enrollment.
  • Sputum producers with volumes less than or equal to 200 mL/day.
  • Under treatment with optimized standard therapy for bronchiectasis that has been stable for at least one year, with no changes in the 28 days prior to enrollment.
  • Eligible for and/or already undergoing respiratory physiotherapy.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of COPD or bronchial asthma interpreted as primary and predominant diseases compared to bronchiectasis.
  • Presence of tracheostomy.
  • History of significant hemoptysis (≥300 mL of blood) or requiring embolization or blood transfusions in the 4 weeks preceding enrollment.
  • Hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg, heart rate > 110 bpm).
  • Undrained pneumothorax (evident on chest X-ray, deemed not worthy of pleural drainage according to standard clinical-assistance pathways and thus subjected to follow-up).
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.

Treatment and study plan

Simeox

Device

The Investigators chose to evaluate this device for respiratory physiotherapy in our patients because it is the only one that offers innovative technology, as, unlike other commercially available devices, it does not require the patient to perform forced breathing. Instead, the patient can exhale calmly at tidal volume. This is expected to reduce the patient's effort and improve compliance with treatment. Furthermore, the vibratory signal with small, rapid, and sequential depressions within the airways could be more effective in mobilizing mucus from the airways, preventing collapse.

Primary outcomes

  1. Measurement of respiratory mechanics (airway resistance)

    Time frame: V1 (Baseline,) Visit 2 (Day 7), Visit 3 (Week 5), Visit 4 (Week 6), Visit 5 (Week 10)

    Airway resistance at 5 Hz (R5) and airway resistance at 20 Hz (R20) measured in cmH2O/L/sec, using Forced Oscillometry Technique (FOT)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of Respiratory Rate

    Time frame: V1 (baseline), V3 (week 5), V5 (week 10)

    RR: Breath/Minutes

  2. Evaluation of blood oxygen

    Time frame: At visits V1 (baseline), V3 (week 5), V5 (week 10)

    SpO2 (%)

  3. Evaluation of hearth rate

    Time frame: At visits V1 (baseline), V3 (week 5), V5 (week 10)

    HR (bpm)

  4. Evaluation of blood pressure

    Time frame: At visits V1 (baseline), V3 (week 5), V5 (week 10)

    Diastolic BP (mmHg) and Sistolic BP (mmHg)

  5. Evaluation of spirometric values.

    Time frame: V1 (Baseline), V3 (Week 5), V5 (Week 10)

    FEV1 (L), FVC (L), TLC (L) measured by Spirometry.

  6. Evaluation of Six-minute walk test (6MWT)

    Time frame: V1 (Baseline), V3 (Week 5), V5 (Week 10)

    Distance covered and vital parameters such as SpO2, heart rate, and respiratory rate at the beginning, at the end, and after recovery from exercise measured by pulse oximeter and calculation of distance walked.

  7. Measurement of adverse events

    Time frame: V1 (Baseline,) Visit 2 (Day 7), Visit 3 (Week 5), Visit 4 (Week 6), Visit 5 (Week 10)

    Assessed in terms of the development of adverse events and their severity. Occurrence of adverse events: Adverse events reported by subjects.

  8. Tolerability and patient comfort

    Time frame: Visit 3 (Week 5), Visit 5 (Week 10)

    will be evaluated using a visual analog scale with a score from 0 to 10, with the latter representing the maximum comfort reported by the patient; measurements will be taken at the end of each of the study's scheduled sessions.

  9. Degree of dyspnea

    Time frame: Visit 3 (Week 5), Visit 5 (Week 10)

    Will be assessed using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale from 0 to 4, with the latter representing the most severe degree of dyspnea. This measurment will be taken the end of each physiotherapy session scheduled in the study.

  10. Volume of sputum (mL)

    Time frame: Visit 3 (Week 5), Visit 5 (Week 10)

    Recorded during the four weeks of treatment with each device using data reported in the "sputum diary"

  11. Quality of Sputum

    Time frame: Visit 3 (Week 5), Visit 5 (Week 10)

    Measured according Murray sputum colour chart stratifies patients according to the presence of mucous (M), muco-purulent (MP) or purulent (P) sputum, during the four weeks of treatment with each device using data reported in the "sputum diary".

  12. Number of exacerbations: Exacerbations reported by subjects.

    Time frame: Visit 3 (Week 5), Visit 5 (Week 10)

    Defined as a deterioration for at least 48 hours of three or more of the following key symptoms: cough, sputum volume or characteristics, sputum purulence, dyspnea and/or exercise intolerance, fatigue, malaise, and hemoptysis, associated with the clinician's belief that a change in treatment for bronchiectasis is necessary, occurring during the 4 weeks of treatment with each of the tested respiratory physiotherapy device

  13. Evaluation of Quality of Life for Bronchiectasis (QoLB)

    Time frame: V1 (Baseline), V3 (Week 5), V5 (Week 10)

    Will be assessed using the Quality of Life for Bronchiectasis (QoLB) questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a better, higher quality of life (fewer symptoms, better function), and lower scores indicate a worse quality of life (more severe symptoms/limitations).

  14. Evaluation of Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ)

    Time frame: V1 (Baseline), V3 (Week 5), V5 (Week 10)

    The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) measures health-related quality of life, scoring from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health status and lower scores indicates poorer health status, higher symptom burden, and greater impact on daily life.

  15. Evaluation of Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)

    Time frame: V1 (Baseline), V3 (Week 5), V5 (Week 10)

    The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures health-related quality of life in patients with respiratory diseases, with total scores ranging from 0 to 100. Lower scores indicate better health (0 = no impairment), while higher scores signify greater impairment (100 = maximum impairment).

  16. Evaluation of Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ)

    Time frame: V1 (Baseline), V3 (Week 5), V5 (Week 10)

    The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) measures the impact of chronic cough on physical, psychological, and social health, with a total score ranging from 3 to 21. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (less impact), while lower scores indicate severe impairment.

  17. Evaluation of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

    Time frame: V1 (Baseline), V3 (Week 5), V5 (Week 10)

    Sleep quality will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The global PSQI score ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality, with a score greater than 5 suggesting significant sleep difficulties.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Stefano Nava, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+39 0512143253

Vittoria Comellini, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison Between Different Respiratory Physiotherapy Techniques in Patients With Bronchiectasis. Conventional Therapy Versus Simeox: a Single-center, Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Study

Acronym: FISIOBRONCHI

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 30, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.