ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo - Ospedale San Paolo
Milan, MI, 20142, Italy
NCT Number: NCT06520007
The goal of this observational study (spontaneous, non-randomised, prospective cohort, phase IV) is to compare the efficacy and safety of two different oral doxycycline treatment protocols (LCP - Low dose continuous protocol & FPP - Full dose pulsed protocol) for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in patients with refractory MGD (OSDI > 13 after at least 2 months treatment with warm compresses and lacrimal substitutes - first-line therapy). Systemic doxycycline doesn't have a standardized treatment protocol and this is why those patients are treated as in normal clinical practice. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Which treatment protocol has a greater impact on patient symptoms during the follow-up (OSDI score reduction)? Which treatment protocol has a greater impact on patient signs during the follow-up (TBUT and corneal staining variations)? Which treatment protocol is safer (in terms of adverse events rate)?
Participants will be visited every 3 months (V0-V1-V2-V3) with signs and symptoms assessment (TBUT, corneal staining, OSDI score) after being treated for 3 months with the assigned doxycycline treatment protocol (LCP or FPP).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–100 year
All sexes
Observational
Milan, MI, 20142, Italy
This spontaneous, prospective, non-randomized, parallel-group, phase IV study was conducted in compliance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
All study participants were fully consented, and written informed consent was obtained.
This study included patients with refractory MGD. Refractory MGD is defined as symptomatic MGC (OSDI > 13 points) despite 2 months of first-line treatment with lacrimal substitutes 3 times per day and meibomian gland expression with warm compresses twice per day.
The study will consist of 3 visits: Baseline (day 0), Visit 2 (day 90 ± 5 - 3rd month), Visit 3 (day 180 ± 5 - 6 month). At each visit, patients will receive an OSDI questionnaire, NIBUT, type I Schirmer test and AS assessment, including TBUT, corneal staining (Oxford scale) At baseline, eligible patients will be enrolled and treated with the assigned protocol. The investigators will assign the protocol (non-randomized) in a 1:1 ratio.
At Visit 2, NIBUT, TBUT, Oxford scale and OSDI improvement will be evaluated compared with Visit 1. Patients will be carefully asked about their compliance with the treatment. Patients who interrupted the treatment for adverse events or low compliance (<75% of the protocol adherence) will exit the study and be excluded from the analysis.
At Visit 3, the study population will be evaluated as done in Visit 2
The protocols in the study are the following:
LCD (low-dose continuous protocol) - 50 mg of doxycycline for three months FPP ( Full-dose pulsed protocol) - 100 mg of doxycycline for the first 15 days of the month for three months.
The enrollment period will last about 6 months. Therefore, the study will end about 6 months after the last patient enrols.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The drug has been prescribed, as in normal clinical practice, with the National Healthcare System. Patients have been fully informed about interactions, toxicity and posology schedule.
Time frame: Baseline - 3 months (90 days ± 5 days) - 6 months (180 days ± 5 days)
Ocular Surface Disease Index
Time frame: Baseline - 3 months (90 days ± 5 days) - 6 months (180 days ± 5 days)
Tear break-up time
Time frame: Baseline - 3 months (90 days ± 5 days) - 6 months (180 days ± 5 days)
Oxford scale has been use to assess corneal staining
Time frame: From baseline up to the 3rd month
Number of dropouts due to drug toxicity
University of Milan
Other
Comparison Between Continuous and Pulsed Oral Doxycycline Treatment Protocols for Refractory Meibomian Gland Dysfunction - 9 Months Follow-up Prospective Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05454956
Blepharitis, Demodex Infestation
Northridge, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05062564
Blepharitis, Cataract
Florence, FI, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06371300
Blepharitis, Dry Eye Syndromes
Auckland, New Zealand
View Trial DetailsNCT01456780
Blepharitis, Dry Eye Syndromes
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details