Comparison Between Arthroscopic Simple Biceps Tenotomy & Anchor Technique Tenotomy with Clinical and Ultrasound Assessment

This research compares two surgical techniques for addressing pathologies of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon: arthroscopic simple biceps tenotomy and anchor tenotomy. The LHB tendon, originating from the supraglenoid tubercle, plays a critical role in forearm supination, elbow flexion, and shoulder abduction. Pathologies affecting this tendon often cause significant shoulder pain, with surgical options including tenotomy and tenodesis. While simple tenotomy is quick and avoids implant complications, it may result in cosmetic deformities like the "Popeye" sign and muscle cramps. Anchor tenotomy, a novel technique, aims to minimize these issues by preventing the Popeye deformity. This study employs a prospective randomized double-blinded controlled trial design at Assiut University Hospitals, involving 72 patients with LHB pathologies such as tendinitis, rotator cuff tears, and subacromial impingement. Exclusion criteria include prior tenodesis or neuromuscular diseases. Clinical outcomes will be assessed using functional scores (e.g., Oxford Shoulder Score), ultrasound evaluation of tendon positioning, and follow-up examinations at intervals up to one year post-surgery. The primary outcome focuses on the presence of the Popeye deformity, while secondary outcomes include postoperative shoulder function and tendon distalization measured via ultrasound. This research aims to provide evidence-based insights into the comparative effectiveness of these two techniques in improving clinical outcomes and minimizing complications.

Inclusion criteria

• Patients with LHB pathologies such as :

Biceps tendinitis Rotator cuff tears Subacromial impengiment Instability & traumatic causes

Exclusion criteria

• LHB Tenodesis Patients with neuromuscular disease