Cipto Mangunkusumo Central National Hospital
Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
NCT Number: NCT03143452
This study aimed to compare the efficacy between 2% lidocaine gel vs 0.5% tetracaine eye drop as topical anesthesia in phacoemulsification
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study and randomized into two groups (Lidocaine gel and tetracaine eye drop group). Lidocaine group received 2% lidocaine gel in 1 ml syringe, applied to the eye. Tetracaine group received 0.5% tetracaine eye drop. Topical anesthesia was given 5 minutes before phacoemulsification. Five minutes after phacoemulsification finished, visual analog score (VAS) and subjects and surgeon's satisfaction were assessed. Every additional topical anesthesia needed was recorded.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dropout Criteria:
2% lidocaine gel in 1 ml syringe, applied to the eye 5 minutes before phacoemulsification
0.5% tetracaine eye drop was given 5 minutes before phacoemulsification
Time frame: Day 1
assessing subject's pain with visual analog scale
Time frame: Day 1
Number of additional topical anesthesia given after the first dose
Time frame: Day 1
Assessment is done using questionnaire
Indonesia University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.