Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06870435

Comparison and Strategy Optimization of Plasma EBV DNA and P85-Ab with VCA/EBNA1-IgA for Screening Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in High-risk Areas

This study is a prospective, self-controlled, multicenter clinical trial. All participants will be tested for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated biomarkers, including the two-antibody method (VCA-IgA and EBNA1-IgA), BNLF2b total antibodies (P85-Ab), and plasma EBV DNA. Furthermore, novel screening biomarkers, such as next-generation sequencing for EBV and castoff cells using nasopharyngeal swabs, will be explored.

First, it aims to investigate whether plasma EBV DNA testing or the P85-Ab testing can achieve higher sensitivity than the current standard two-antibody method testing while maintaining specificity in NPC screening, thereby identifying the optimal initial NPC screening strategy. Based on the determined optimal initial screening strategy, the study will validate the proposed two-step method (subjects first undergo two-antibody method testing and P85-Ab testing; those positive for either one biomarker above proceed to plasma EBV DNA testing; subjects positive in both steps are defined as high-risk and receive endoscopic examinations with or without biopsy) compared with the single-step method (subjects simultaneously undergo two-antibody method testing, P85-Ab testing, and plasma EBV DNA testing; subjects with any positive biomarker undergo endoscopic examinations with or without biopsy) and each single screening testing. The aim is to determine whether two-step method can further improve the positive predictive value (PPV) while maintaining non-inferior sensitivity, thereby enhancing screening efficiency, reducing the rate of invasive procedures (such as endoscopic biopsies), and lowering medical costs and insurance burdens.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Voluntarily signed informed consent.
  • Age between 30 and 69 years at the time of screening.
  • Residents of Guangdong Province or Guangxi Province.
  • Able to cooperate with long-term follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe medical comorbidities, significant organ (heart, lung, liver, kidney) dysfunction, or psychiatric disorders.
  • Severe autoimmune diseases or immunodeficiency.
  • History of or current malignant tumors.
  • Inability to cooperate with the study due to psychological, social, familial, or geographical reasons.

Treatment and study plan

Blood, nasopharyngeal swab and saliva

Biological

Collect blood, nasopharyngeal swab and saliva samples from participants.

EBNA1-IgA, VCA-IgA, P85-Ab and EBV DNA

Diagnostic Test

Detect EBNA1-IgA, VCA-IgA, P85-Ab and EBV DNA for all participants.

Novel screening biomarkers

Diagnostic Test

Next-generation sequencing for EBV and castoff cells using nasopharyngeal swabs, etc..

Endoscopic examinations with or without biopsy

Diagnostic Test

High-risk participants will refer to endoscopic examinations with or without biopsy

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of EBV DNA testing, P85-Ab testing and the two-antibody method testing

    Time frame: At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.

    To investigate whether plasma EBV DNA testing or the P85-Ab testing can achieve higher sensitivity than the current standard two-antibody method testing while maintaining specificity in NPC screening. Sensitivity refers to the proportion of actual positive cases (true positives) correctly identified by a test.

  2. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the two-step method, single-step method and each single screening testing.

    Time frame: At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.

    To determine whether two-step method can further improve the positive predictive value (PPV) while maintaining non-inferior sensitivity. PPV refers to the proportion of positive test results that are true positives. Sensitivity refers to the proportion of actual positive cases (true positives) correctly identified by a test.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Negative predictive value (NPV)

    Time frame: At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.

    NPV refers to the proportion of positive negative results that are true negatives.

  2. Early diagnosis rate of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

    Time frame: At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.

    The proportion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients diagnosed at stages I and II according to the 9th version of AJCC TNM system.

  3. Number needed to screen (NNS)

    Time frame: At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.

    NNS refers to the amount of screening participants to identify one nasopharyngeal carcinoma case.

  4. Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Death Rates

    Time frame: At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.

    Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma deaths confirmed in participants by a death review committee if available, otherwise by death certificate. Rate is the number of deaths divided by person years of follow-up in the study.

  5. Death Rates From All Causes

    Time frame: At screening, 3 years and 10 years thereafter.

    Deaths confirmed in participants by a death review committee if available, otherwise by death certificate. Rate is the number of deaths divided by person years of follow-up in the study.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jiong-lin Liang, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

86-13172018626

Ming-yuan Chen, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

86-13903052650

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ming-Yuan Chen

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison and Strategy Optimization of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA and BNLF2b Total Antibodies (P85-Ab) with VCA-IgA and EBNA1-IgA for Screening Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in High-risk Areas

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2035
First posted
Mar 11, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 11, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.