Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03611907

Comparing Two Types of Needle for Oocytes Retrieval

In the early stages of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), oocyte retrieval was performed via laparoscopy, a cumbersome and expensive process requiring general anesthesia. Today, transvaginal oocyte retrieval for ART is a routine procedure performed under ultrasound guidance. Double-lumen retrieval needles, which are capable of flushing ovarian follicles, were developed to overcome the possibility of oocyte retention within the ovarian follicles and retrieval collection system. Single lumen needles have been introduced and are routinely used by most groups due to their supposed ability to retrieve the same number of oocytes in a shorter operation time.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–42 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti

Rozzano, MI, 20089, Italy

About this study

After a long period in which Humanitas department used double lumen needles for oocytes retrieval in the last four years the choice of the needle is an operator choice, usually influenced by the number of follicles present at human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) trigger.

This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial is designed to highlight differences between Double Lumen Aspiration Needle and Single Lumen Needle commonly used in Humanitas' clinical practice primarly in terms of number of retrived oocytes per procedure (A). Secondary outcomes are the number of punctured follicles (B), the retrieval rate (%) (A/B), the number of follicles at the last ultrasound performed prior to the ovulation trigger (C), the number of retrieved oocytes / number of follicles at trigger-day (A/C), retrieval procedure time (D), single oocyte retrieval time (D/A), the number of mature oocytes (and MII) and complications rate. Number of transferred embryos, number of frozen embryos and oocytes, clinical pregnancy rate per retrieval and per transfer (considering the number of pregnancies diagnosed by US visualization of one or more gestational sacs or definitive clinical signs of pregnancy per 100 cycles) and total number of clinical pregnancies with fetal heart beat (confirmed by visualization of one or more embryos with heartbeat at early dating ultrasound), are also evaluated. Standard protocols will be used for controlled ovarian hyper stimulation. Trans vaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval will be performed 36 hours ± 2 after hCG injection with the patient under deep sedation.

One hundred patients per each needle will be enrolled in this trial.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • IVF/ intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles;

Exclusion criteria

  • Ovarian Endometriomas;
  • Severe previous pelvic inflammatory disease with frozen pelvis

Treatment and study plan

Oocyte retrieval with only aspiration system "SL1(Cook® Single Lumen)"

Device

In this intervention a 17-Gauge needle is used to aspirate the follicles

Oocyte retrieval with aspiration and flushing system "DL1 (Cook® EchoTip® Double Lumen)"

Device

In this intervention a 17-Gauge needle is used to aspirate follicle, and consequently a 1 mL flush is injected and aspirated twice for each punctured follicle

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of retrieved oocytes per procedure

    Time frame: through study completion, 9 months

    Comparison of the number of retrieved oocytes per procedure among the two arms

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time for single oocyte retrieval (minutes)

    Time frame: through study completion, 9 months

    comparison between the recovery time for single oocyte in days among the two arms

  2. Percentage of MII oocytes retrieved

    Time frame: through study completion, 9 months

    A comparison between the percentage of MII oocytes retrieved among the two arms

  3. Oocyte retrieval percentage per aspirated follicles

    Time frame: through study completion, 9 months

    Comparison between the oocyte retrieval percentage per aspirated follicles among the two arms

  4. number of punctured follicles

    Time frame: through study completion, 9 months

    Comparison of the number of punctured follicles among the two arms

  5. number of follicles at the trigger day

    Time frame: through study completion, 9 months

    Comparison of the number of follicles at the trigger day among the two arms

  6. the number of retrieved oocytes/ number of follicles at the trigger day

    Time frame: through study completion, 9 months

    Comparison of the number of retrieved oocytes/ number of follicles at the trigger day among the two arms

  7. time of the single procedure

    Time frame: through study completion, 9 months

    Comparison of the time of the single procedure among the two arms

  8. Complication rate

    Time frame: through study completion, 9 months

    Comparison of the complication rate among the two arms

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Needles for Oocyte's Retrieval.

Acronym: NEEDLE

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2021
First posted
Aug 2, 2018
Registry last updated
Sep 27, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.