Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04233866

Comparing Two Treatment Combinations, Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Liposomal Irinotecan for Older Patients With Pancreatic Cancer That Has Spread

This phase II trial compares two treatment combinations: gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel, or fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and liposomal irinotecan in older patients with pancreatic cancer that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic). Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride, nab-paclitaxel, fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and liposomal irinotecan, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. This study may help doctors find out which treatment combination is better at prolonging life in older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

70 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. Overall survival.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Progression-free survival. II. Objective tumor response.

III. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)/quality of life (QOL) related objectives:

IIIa. Hypothesize that lower scores in functional status assessment tool - instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) will correlate with higher rates of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy toxicity.

IV. CGA/QOL related exploratory objectives:

IVa. Evaluation of other pre-treatment CGA domains including co-morbidities, depression, nutrition and cognition as predictors of chemotherapy tolerance.

IVb. Evaluation of the association between change in functional status during treatment course (comparison between activities of daily living [ADL] and IADL score pre-treatment and at time of disease evaluation) as predictors of chemotherapy tolerance.

IVc. Evaluation of the correlation between CGA domains and overall survival by treatment arm.

IVd. Evaluation of the difference in QOL scores (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Hepatitis [FACT-Hep] version 4) between baseline measures and assessment during treatment course between by treatment arms.

V. Focused evaluation of toxicities that are of interest for older patients including: peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, falls, emergency room visits, hospitalization, treatment modification and discontinuation.

VI. Imaging correlative study objectives:

VIa. Evaluate the association between baseline and change during treatment of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and rates of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy toxicity experienced on treatment.

VIb. Evaluate the association between baseline and change during treatment of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and overall survival among older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

VIc. Evaluate the association between baseline and change during treatment of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and geriatric assessment scores evaluating functional status.

VII. Laboratory correlative study objectives:

VIIa. Evaluation of the correlation between base line levels of biomarkers of aging (CRP and IL-6) and rates of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy toxicity during therapy.

VIIb. Evaluation of the correlation between changes in levels of CRP and IL-6 during therapy and rates of grade 3 chemotherapy toxicity.

VIIc. Evaluation of the correlation between baseline levels of biomarkers of aging (CRP and IL-6) and overall survival among older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

VIId. Evaluation of the correlation between levels of baseline biomarkers of aging (CRP and IL-6) and geriatric assessments scores evaluation functional status.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM A: Patients receive gemcitabine intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes and nab-paclitaxel IV over 30 minutes on day 1. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

ARM B: Patients receive fluorouracil IV over 46 hours starting on day 1. Patients also receive leucovorin IV over 90-120 minutes and liposomal irinotecan IV over 90 minutes on day 1. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Newly diagnosed untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. However, previous surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy will be allowed, provided radiation therapy is completed at least 2 weeks prior to registration and adjuvant therapy was administered more than 6 months prior to registration. Patients with the following histology are excluded: acinar cell; adenosquamous carcinoma
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • Patient is an English speaker with the ability to understand and complete the informed consent and questionnaires
  • Leukocytes >= 3,000/mcL (obtained within 4 weeks of registration)
  • Absolute neutrophil count >= 1,500/mcL (obtained within 4 weeks of registration)
  • Platelets >= 100,000/mcL (obtained within 4 weeks of registration)
  • Total bilirubin =< institutional upper limit of normal (ULN) (obtained within 4 weeks of registration)
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT])/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase [SGPT]) =< 2.5 x institutional ULN (obtained within 4 weeks of registration)
  • Creatinine =< institutional ULN unless data exists supporting safe use at lower kidney function values, no lower than 30 mL/min/1.73 m^2 (obtained within 4 weeks of registration)
  • Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >= 40 mL/min/1.73 m^2 unless data exists supporting safe use at lower kidney function values, no lower than 30 mL/min/1.73 m^2 (obtained within 4 weeks of registration)
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients on effective anti-retroviral therapy with undetectable viral load within 6 months of registration are eligible for this protocol. HIV positive (+) patients who are on ritonavir or/and cobicistat-based regimen must be switched to alternative anti-retroviral therapy (ART)
  • For patients with evidence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, the HBV viral load must be undetectable on suppressive therapy, if indicated
  • Patients with a history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection must have been treated and cured. For patients with HCV infection who are currently on treatment, they are eligible if they have an undetectable HCV viral load
  • Male patients must agree not to father children while on study
  • Patients with known history or current symptoms of cardiac disease, or history of treatment with cardiotoxic agents, should have a clinical risk assessment of cardiac function using the New York Heart Association functional classification. To be eligible for this protocol, patients should be class 2B or better
  • Patients must have measurable disease and scans must be done within 4 weeks of registration
  • Patients classified to have mild-moderate abnormalities in any of the domains evaluated in the screening geriatric assessment and are classified as "vulnerable" are eligible. Patients classified without any abnormalities ("fit") or with severe cognitive/functional impairment or high co-morbidity score ("frail") on the screening geriatric assessment are ineligible
  • Patients must agree not to take any medications or substances that are strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4. Those who are randomized to liposomal irinotecan treatment arm should avoid drugs that are UGT1A1 inhibitors

Treatment and study plan

Fluorouracil

Drug

Given IV

Other names: 5 Fluorouracil, 5 Fluorouracilum, 5 FU, 5-Fluoro-2,4(1H, 3H)-pyrimidinedione, 5-Fluorouracil, 5-Fluracil, 5-FU, 5FU, AccuSite, Carac, Fluoro Uracil, Fluouracil, Flurablastin, Fluracedyl, Fluracil, Fluril, Fluroblastin, Ribofluor, Ro 2-9757, Ro-2-9757

Gemcitabine

Drug

Given IV

Other names: dFdC, dFdCyd, Difluorodeoxycytidine

gemcitabine hydrochloride

Drug

Given IV

Other names: dFdCyd, Difluorodeoxycytidine Hydrochloride, FF 10832, FF-10832, FF10832, Gemcitabine HCI, Gemzar, LY-188011, LY188011

Leucovorin

Drug

Given IV

Other names: Folinic acid

leucovorin calcium

Drug

Given IV

Other names: Adinepar, Calcifolin, Calcium (6S)-Folinate, Calcium Folinate, Calcium Leucovorin, Calfolex, Calinat, Cehafolin, Citofolin, Citrec, Citrovorum Factor, Cromatonbic Folinico, Dalisol, Disintox, Divical, Ecofol, Emovis, Factor, Citrovorum, Flynoken A, Folaren, Folaxin, FOLI-cell, Foliben, Folidan, Folidar, Folinac, Folinate Calcium, folinic acid, Folinic Acid Calcium Salt Pentahydrate, Folinoral, Folinvit, Foliplus, Folix, Imo, Lederfolat, Lederfolin, Leucosar, leucovorin, Rescufolin, Rescuvolin, Tonofolin, Wellcovorin

liposomal irinotecan

Drug

Given IV

Other names: Irinotecan Liposome, MM-398, nal-IRI, Nanoliposomal Irinotecan, Nanoparticle Liposome Formulation of Irinotecan, Onivyde, PEP02

Nab-paclitaxel

Drug

Given IV

Other names: ABI 007, ABI-007, Abraxane, Albumin-bound Paclitaxel, Albumin-Stabilized Nanoparticle Paclitaxel, Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Paclitaxel, Nanoparticle Paclitaxel, Paclitaxel Albumin, paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation, protein-bound paclitaxel

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Other

Ancillary studies

Other names: Quality of Life Assessment

Questionnaire Administration

Other

Ancillary studies

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival (OS)

    Time frame: Up to 2 years post treatment

    Will use a stratified log rank test with one-sided alpha of 0.05 and 90% power. A truncated O'Brien-Fleming boundary will be used to control type I error for efficacy testing and repeated confidence interval methodology on the OS hazard ratio will be used for futility analyses

Secondary outcomes

  1. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)

    Time frame: Up to 2 years post treatment

    Will evaluate the association between functional status as recorded by the IADL assessment tool and rates of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy toxicity within treatment arm. Will use logistic regression and a 0.025 level one-sided test for the odds ratio.

Other outcomes

  1. Progression-free survival (PFS)

    Time frame: Up to 2 years post treatment

  2. Objective tumor response

    Time frame: Up to 2 years post treatment

  3. Co-morbidities as a predictor of chemotherapy tolerance

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

  4. Depression as a predictor of chemotherapy tolerance

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

  5. Nutrition as a predictor of chemotherapy tolerance

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

  6. Cognition as a predictor of chemotherapy tolerance

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

  7. Change in functional status

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

    Will evaluate the association between changes in functional status using a geriatric assessment, which will include the number of falls, cumulative illness rating scale, body mass index, weight loss and scores, such as the geriatric depression scale, and the blessed orientation memory concentration test. These will be treated as continuous measures as predictors of chemotherapy tolerance and will be assessed using a paired t-test. Longitudinal analyses will be conducted to evaluate the trajectory of patient-reported outcomes over time for each arm and to compare across the arms. Will explore the possibility that geriatric assessments at baseline that are prognostic for subsequent adverse events of interest, and will perform regression models for key adverse events (logistic, Poisson or linear regression as appropriate) to assess the relative predictive ability of the proposed geriatric assessments over those traditionally used to identify patients at risk.

  8. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) domains

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

    Will evaluate the correlation between CGA domains and overall survival by treatment arm.

  9. Quality of life scores

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

    Will be assessed as a continuous variable by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment - Hepatitis version 4 between baseline measures and assessment during treatment course by treatment arms.

  10. Incidence of toxicities in older patients

    Time frame: Up to 2 years post treatment

    Will include peripheral neuropathy grade 2 or higher, fatigue grade 3 or higher, falls, emergency room visits, hospitalization, treatment modification and discontinuation. These data will be obtained and recorded by the study nurse while conducting the patient's toxicity evaluation using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

  11. Rate of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy toxicity experienced on treatment

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

    Will evaluate the association between skeletal muscle index (SMI) and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and rate of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy toxicity. In a preliminary analysis, the longitudinal course of SMI and IMAT will be examined graphically and use longitudinal regression modeling to account for correlations due to the repeated assessments. The main analysis will utilize logistic regression modeling. Models will be fitted first with only the baseline values of SMI and IMAT and subsequently will be elaborated to include both baseline and change from baseline. The models will control for sociodemographic and clinical status measures at baseline and will also consider interactions between the two imaging-based markers

  12. OS

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

    Will evaluate the association between SMI and IMAT and OS. In a preliminary analysis, the longitudinal course of SMI and IMAT will be examined graphically and use Cox regression modeling to account for correlations due to the repeated assessments. The main analysis will utilize logistic regression modeling. Models will be fitted first with only the baseline values of SMI and IMAT and subsequently will be elaborated to include both baseline and change from baseline. The models will control for sociodemographic and clinical status measures at baseline and will also consider interactions between the two imaging-based markers.

  13. Geriatric assessment scores

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

    Will evaluate the association between skeletal muscle index (SMI) and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and geriatric assessment scores evaluating functional status. In a preliminary analysis, the longitudinal course of SMI and IMAT will be examined graphically and linear regression modeling to account for correlations due to the repeated assessments. The main analysis will utilize logistic regression modeling. Models will be fitted first with only the baseline values of SMI and IMAT and subsequently will be elaborated to include both baseline and change from baseline. The models will control for sociodemographic and clinical status measures at baseline and will also consider interactions between the two imaging-based markers

  14. Toxicity and biomarkers of aging (CRP and IL-6)

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

    Will evaluate the association between biomarkers of aging (CRP and IL-6) and rates of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy toxicity. Will be analyzed as continuous variables and correlated with clinical outcomes. Analysis of interaction with treatment arm will be performed but power for these effects is lower as the study is not designed to detect interactions. Logistic regression will be used to determine if levels of these biomarkers serve as predictors of toxicity or binary measures of efficacy (response).

  15. Changes in levels of CRP and IL-6 and toxicity

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

    Will evaluate the association correlation between changes in levels of CRP and IL-6 and rates of grade 3 chemotherapy toxicity. Will be analyzed as continuous variables and correlated with clinical outcomes. Analysis of interaction with treatment arm will be performed but power for these effects is lower as the study is not designed to detect interactions. Logistic regression will be used to determine if levels of these biomarkers serve as predictors of toxicity or binary measures of efficacy (response).

  16. OS and biomarkers of aging (CRP and IL-6)

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

    Will evaluate the association correlation between changes in levels of CRP and IL-6 and overall survival. Will be analyzed as continuous variables and correlated with clinical outcomes. Analysis of interaction with treatment arm will be performed but power for these effects is lower as the study is not designed to detect interactions. Standard time to event analyses (Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models) will be used to determine association of biomarkers with PFS and OS.

  17. Geriatric assessment scores and biomarkers of aging (CRP and IL-6)

    Time frame: Baseline up to time of disease evaluation, assessed up to 2 years

    Will evaluate the association correlation between levels of CRP and IL-6 and geriatric assessments scores evaluation functional status. Will be analyzed as continuous variables and correlated with clinical outcomes. Analysis of interaction with treatment arm will be performed but power for these effects is lower as the study is not designed to detect interactions. Logistic regression will be used to determine if levels of these biomarkers serve as predictors of toxicity or binary measures of efficacy (response).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group

Network

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel Compared With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Liposomal Irinotecan in Older Patients With Treatment Naïve Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (GIANT)

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 18, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.