Orsi Academy
Melle, Belgium, 9090
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07669974
This randomized non-inferiority study evaluates whether a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) training pathway incorporating the IMRA Surgical Prostatectomy Class V Hydrogel Model is as effective as the current standard training pathway in achieving surgical proficiency.
Participants enrolled in a standardized robotic surgery training course will be randomly assigned to one of two training pathways that differ only in the training model used during one phase of the course. All participants will subsequently undergo assessment during human cadaver training.
The primary outcome is the proportion of participants who achieve predefined proficiency criteria during the final assessment. Secondary outcomes include technical performance scores, technical errors, self-reported confidence, perceived readiness to perform robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, and feasibility of implementing a synthetic model-based training pathway.
The study aims to determine whether a high-fidelity hydrogel model can provide training outcomes comparable to those achieved with biological models, supporting more ethical, scalable, and standardized robotic surgery training.
Interested in participating?
Request InfoAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Melle, Belgium, 9090
Location status: Recruiting
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is one of the most technically demanding procedures in robotic urologic surgery and requires structured training to ensure safe and effective skill acquisition. The Certified Curriculum in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy (CC-ERUS) is a proficiency-based training pathway developed by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) to standardize training and assessment in RARP. The curriculum includes simulation-based training, biological models, and human cadaver training before participants are assessed for proficiency.
The use of biological training models presents ethical, logistical, regulatory, and scalability challenges. High-fidelity synthetic hydrogel models have recently been developed as potential alternatives that may provide realistic anatomical representation and tissue handling characteristics while reducing reliance on biological models. The present study evaluates whether incorporation of the IMRA Surgical Prostatectomy Class V Hydrogel Model within a standardized RARP training pathway results in training outcomes that are non-inferior to those achieved using the current standard training pathway.
This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial embedded within a standardized five-day robotic surgery training course at ORSI Academy. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two training pathways. Both pathways are identical in educational content, duration, faculty supervision, and learning objectives. The only difference between groups is the training modality used during Day 4 of the course. Participants assigned to the standard pathway will train on human cadaver models, whereas participants assigned to the experimental pathway will train using the IMRA Surgical Prostatectomy Class V Hydrogel Model.
On Day 5, all participants will undergo training and assessment on human cadaver models under identical conditions. Technical performance will be evaluated using validated procedure-specific metrics for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. The primary objective is to determine whether the hydrogel-based training pathway is non-inferior to the standard pathway with respect to achievement of predefined proficiency criteria during the final human cadaver assessment. Additional analyses will evaluate technical performance metrics, procedural errors, task completion parameters, participant confidence, perceived readiness to perform RARP, cognitive workload, and participant evaluation of the training pathway.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Structured robotic surgery training pathway incorporating the IMRA Surgical Prostatectomy Class V Hydrogel Model as part of a proficiency-based progression training pathway.
Standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy training pathway without use of the IMRA Surgical Prostatectomy Class V Hydrogel Model
Time frame: At completion of Day 5 human cadaver training assessment
Proportion of participants achieving predefined proficiency criteria during the final human cadaver training assessment. Technical performance will be assessed using validated robot-assisted radical prostatectomy assessment metrics (Mottrie et al., doi:10.1111/bju.15311). Participants will be classified as proficient if they complete the assessed procedure with no more than 20 General Errors and 0 Critical Errors. The primary outcome will be the proportion of participants meeting these proficiency criteria.
Time frame: At completion of Day 5 human cadaver training assessment
Technical performance during the final human cadaver assessment will be evaluated using validated robot-assisted radical prostatectomy assessment metrics (Mottrie et al., doi:10.1111/bju.15311). The number of General Errors, the number of Critical Errors, and the time required to complete the procedure will be recorded and compared between study groups. Lower numbers of errors and shorter completion times indicate better technical performance.
Time frame: End of training course - Day 5
Participant confidence in performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy will be assessed using the ORSI RARP Confidence Questionnaire, a study-specific Likert-scale questionnaire. Responses will be collected using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater confidence.
Time frame: Immediately after completion of the relevant training session
Participant workload measured using the NASA Task Load Index questionnaire. Total score range: 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater perceived workload.
Time frame: End of training course - Day 5
Participant evaluation of the training pathway and educational experience will be assessed using the ORSI Training Pathway Evaluation Questionnaire, a study-specific post-course questionnaire. Responses will be collected using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater acceptability and satisfaction.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Eva Vanderstraeten
CONTACT
Niki Rashidian
CONTACT
Orsi Academy
Other
A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial Comparing Two Training Modalities for Achieving Proficiency in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06981026
Neoplasms, Prehabilitation
Olomouc, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT06274047
Androgen Axis Suppression, Genital Diseases
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06511141
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Female Urogenital Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06915909
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Stevenage, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
View Trial Details