Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02816866

Comparing Two Modes of Survivorship Care

The main purpose of this study is to research the comparative effectiveness of two potential models of health care to deliver preventive services and chronic care management to the growing population of adult and pediatric survivors of childhood cancer. The central hypothesis is that survivorship care delivered by a subject's primary care doctor after the subject is empowered with individualized follow-up recommendations prepared by a cancer survivor specialist is similar to care provided in a specialty survival clinic.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

1 year–29 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Although 80% of children with cancer will be cured of their primary disease, at least 70% of survivors will develop chronic medical, neurocognitive, and/or emotional conditions as a complication of their therapy. Most of these conditions are amenable to prevention and early intervention. In response, the Institute of Medicine strongly advised that all cancer patients should receive survivorship care with the following key elements: 1) a summary of previous cancer therapy, 2) individualized life-long screening for potential adverse therapy-related effects, and 3) education regarding desirable health behaviors. However, less than 30% of survivors receive recommended care. There is a tremendous need for research that addresses how to best implement evidence-based recommendations for this population.

Two main health care delivery models have been advocated for survivorship care, but no comparison studies exist. The first model is a specialty survivor clinic, usually at a cancer treatment center. The second model, termed the empowered primary care model, involves patients receiving an individualized "prescription" for follow-up care prepared by a cancer survivor specialist to be implemented by the primary care doctor. Each model poses unique strengths and weaknesses. Specialty survivor clinics can be expensive and geographically inaccessible, can cause anxiety and stress to patients, and can accommodate limited numbers of patients. Primary care doctors may lack adequate expertise and time for these complex patients. Unless we know how these approaches compare with regard to quality of care and risks, advocates and policy makers will be stymied in their efforts to support the health needs of cancer survivors. This study seeks to compare subjects randomized to the empowered primary care model vs. a specialty survivor clinic.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of any malignancy at age <18 years and reported to Yale-New Haven Hospital or Connecticut Children's Medical Center (CCMC) tumor registry
  • Currently alive and cancer-free
  • Primary residence within approximately 100 miles of Yale-New Haven Hospital or CCMC
  • ≥ 1 year status post completion of all cancer-related therapy
  • Elapsed time of less than 12.0 years since diagnosis of malignancy
  • Speaking and writing knowledge of English. For subjects <18 years, at least one parent must satisfy this requirement.
  • No previous attendance at the Yale HEROS or CCMC Reach for the STARS survivorship clinics, or other specialty survivorship clinic

Exclusion criteria

  • n/a

Treatment and study plan

empowered primary care model

Other

mode of survivorship care

specialty survivor clinic

Other

mode of survivorship care

Primary outcomes

  1. adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance (medical record abstraction)

    Time frame: 12 months post-intervention

    quality of survivorship care

  2. number of newly-identified late effects of therapy (medical record abstraction)

    Time frame: 12 months post-intervention

    quality of survivorship care

Secondary outcomes

  1. anxiety (Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI))

    Time frame: 12 months post-intervention

    adverse effects of receiving survivorship care

  2. depression (Behavior Assessment System for Children, 2nd Edition (BASC-2))

    Time frame: 12 months post-intervention

    adverse effects of receiving survivorship care

  3. post-traumatic stress symptoms (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index (PTSD-RI))

    Time frame: 12 months post-intervention

    adverse effects of receiving survivorship care

  4. level of physical activity (2008 questionnaires of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS))

    Time frame: 12 months post-intervention

    adherence to desirable health behaviors

  5. avoidance of tobacco (2008 questionnaires of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS))

    Time frame: 12 months post-intervention

    adherence to desirable health behaviors

  6. intake of at least five servings per day of fruits and vegetables (2008 questionnaires of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS))

    Time frame: 12 months post-intervention

    adherence to desirable health behaviors

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Yale University

Other

Collaborators

  • American Cancer Society, Inc.

Registry information

Official study title

Comparing Two Modes of Survivorship Care: A Randomized Trial

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jun 29, 2016
Registry last updated
Nov 19, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.