Comparing the Effects of Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy for Sacroiliac Joint Injections

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is a source of low back pain that causes significant pain and disability. Injection of the sacroiliac joint with a local anesthetic/corticosteroid mixture has shown efficacy in treating this condition, when conservative therapy fails. The use of fluoroscopic guidance and anatomic landmarks are traditional methods for performing this injection; however, ultrasound imaging has recently been utilized for performing this procedure. Although studies exist that describe and validate the ultrasound technique, no studies exist that compare the techniques with respect to short-term and long-term outcomes. In this study, the primary objective is to determine if a difference exists between a fluoroscopic-guided technique and ultrasound-guided technique with respect to pain and function. A secondary objective is to compare the two techniques with respect to procedural characteristics.

Inclusion criteria

• Diagnosis of SIJ dysfunction by history and physical exam

• History: Either low back pain or buttock pain
• Exam: Either tenderness to palpation over the SIJ or a positive provocative maneuver (i.e., Patrick's, Gaenslen's, and/or Yeoman's test)
• Failed a trial of conservative therapy which may included medications, physical therapy, or both
• Age > 18
• Patient agrees to participate in study

Exclusion criteria

• Coagulopathy
• Renal or Hepatic Failure
• Current Pregnancy or actively pursuing pregnancy
• Known allergy to local anesthetic or steroids
• Infection at site of needle placement or SIJ infection
• Patient unable to consent himself or herself
• Patient refusal
• Prior surgical procedures involving the SIJ
• Body Mass Index > 35 kg/m2