Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07632612

Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica

objective of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the efficacy of both tensioner and slider neurodynamic approaches in patients suffering from sciatica. This study seeks to establish which approach is more efficacious in alleviating pain intensity, disability functional, and mobility. The results of this study will assist physical therapists in making an informed decision on the type of neurodynamic therapy for their patients.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

20 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ibadat International Hospital

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Sojla Bashir, DPT, MSPT MSK

CONTACT

[email protected]

+923008580082

About this study

Due to the increasing prevalence of sciatica and evidence based treatment options using physiotherapy that offers effective alleviation of pain and rehabilitation of function. Neurodynamic mobilization focuses on addressing neurological problems; thus, there is a need to know about the effectiveness of the different types of the technique being used.

The current research is expected to contribute to the existing literature in the area of physiotherapy concerning the identification of the most effective neurodynamic technique in the case of sciatica. These findings could be helpful for medical practitioners during their work, making decisions and planning treatment. At the same time, the results of the investigation may become the basis for further research.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with radicular pain persisting for 12 weeks to 1 year, with no acute episode in the last 4 weeks
  • Unilateral symptoms radiating below the buttock to thigh, knee, or lower leg
  • Positive Slump Test
  • Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test above 45°
  • Functional limitation during activities such as walking or lifting

Exclusion criteria

  • BMI < 20 kg/m² or > 30 kg/m²
  • Previous history of spinal surgery
  • Presence of red flags (significant motor/sensory loss, altered reflexes, or bowel/bladder dysfunction)
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • History of vertebral fracture or significant spinal/limb trauma
  • Systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular, or renal disease)
  • Progressive neurological deficits (motor weakness, sensory loss, reflex changes)
  • Pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

Slider Neurodynamic Technique Group

Other

will receive slider neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.

Tensioner Neurodynamic Technique Group

Other

will receive tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    will be measured using VAS

  2. Functional disability

    Time frame: Baseline to week 8

    measured using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hip range of motion

    Time frame: Baseline to week 8

    assessed using Goniometer

  2. Lumbar flexion Range of Motion

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    measured using Modified-Modified Schober Test (MMST)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Sidra Hanif, DPT, MSNMPT, PhD PT

CONTACT

[email protected]

+923335985631

Sojla Bashir, DPT, MSPT MSK

CONTACT

[email protected]

+923008580082

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ibadat International University, Islamabad

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica: A Randomised Control Trial

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 8, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.