Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo collection of blood samples
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT04802161
This phase II trial studies the effect of adding pomalidomide to usual chemotherapy treatment (daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome) in treating patients with newly diagnosed acute leukemia with myelodysplastic syndrome-related changes. Pomalidomide may stop the growth of blood vessels, stimulate the immune system, and kill cancer cells. Chemotherapy drugs, such as daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Adding pomalidomide to chemotherapy treatment with daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome may be effective in improving some treatment outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed acute leukemia with myelodysplastic syndrome-related changes.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To establish recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of pomalidomide after liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine (daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome) induction.
II. To compare the rate of overall complete response (CR)/complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) with daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome + pomalidomide versus daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome alone in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with preexisting myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN); therapy-related AML (t-AML); or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (MRC) based on cytogenetics or morphologic dysplasia.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate and compare rates of CR (full hematologic recovery) between daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome + pomalidomide versus daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome alone in newly diagnosed AML with preexisting MDS, CMML or MPN, t-AML or AML with MRC.
II. To evaluate and compare toxicities (including treatment-related mortality) of daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome + pomalidomide versus daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome alone in newly diagnosed AML with preexisting MDS, CMML or MPN, t-AML, or AML with MRC based on cytogenetics or morphologic dysplasia.
III. To detect and compare the presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry in those who achieve CR/CRi with daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome + pomalidomide versus daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome alone in newly diagnosed AML with preexisting MDS, CMML or MPN, t-AML, or AML with MRC based on cytogenetics or morphologic dysplasia.
IV. To compare median event-free survival (EFS) of daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome + pomalidomide versus daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome alone in newly diagnosed AML with preexisting MDS, CMML or MPN, t-AML, or AML with MRC based on cytogenetics or morphologic dysplasia.
V. To compare median overall survival (OS) of daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome + pomalidomide versus daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome alone in newly diagnosed AML with preexisting MDS, CMML or MPN, t-AML, or AML with MRC based on cytogenetics or morphologic dysplasia.
VI. To compare median and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) after CR/CRi with daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome + pomalidomide versus daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome alone in newly diagnosed AML with preexisting MDS, CMML or MPN, t-AML, or AML with MRC based on cytogenetics or morphologic dysplasia.
VII. To compare rates of allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) after daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome + pomalidomide versus daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome alone in newly diagnosed AML with preexisting MDS, CMML or MPN, t-AML, or AML with MRC based on cytogenetics or morphologic dysplasia.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess for molecular biomarkers, Aiolos expression, and immune correlates of response with daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome + pomalidomide versus daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome alone in newly diagnosed AML with preexisting MDS, CMML or MPN, t-AML, or AML with MRC based on cytogenetics or morphologic dysplasia.
II. To assess for differences in MRD by molecular based platforms in daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome + pomalidomide versus daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome alone in newly diagnosed AML with preexisting MDS, CMML or MPN, t-AML, or AML with MRC based on cytogenetics or morphologic dysplasia.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A:
INDUCTION: Patients receive liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine intravenously (IV) over 90 minutes on days 1, 3, and 5 and then pomalidomide orally (PO) once daily (QD) beginning between days 21-30 for 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who do not respond, may receive a second cycle of liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 3 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
CONSOLIDATION: Patients who achieve CR/CRi receive liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 3. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 cycles in the absence of disease progression and unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo bone marrow aspirate and biopsy and collection of blood samples throughout all phases of the trial.
ARM B:
INDUCTION: Patients receive liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine intravenously (IV) over 90 minutes on days 1, 3, and 5 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who do not respond, may receive a second cycle of liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 3 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
CONSOLIDATION: Patients who achieve CR/CRi receive liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 3. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 cycles in the absence of disease progression and unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo bone marrow aspirate and biopsy and collection of blood samples throughout all phases of the trial.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 30 days, then up to 5 years after the start of induction therapy or until death, whichever occurs first.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo collection of blood samples
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
Undergo bone marrow aspirate and biopsy
Given IV
Other names: CPX 351, CPX-351, CPX351, Cytarabine and Daunorubicin Liposomal, Cytarabine-Daunorubicin Liposome for Injection, Daunorubicin and Cytarabine (Liposomal), Liposomal AraC-Daunorubicin CPX-351, Liposomal Cytarabine-Daunorubicin, Liposome-encapsulated Combination of Daunorubicin and Cytarabine, Vyxeos
Given PO
Other names: 4-Aminothalidomide, Actimid, CC 4047, CC-4047, CC4047, Imnovid, Pomalyst
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be assessed and compared with both arms A and B.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after last dose, up to 2 years
Will be assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v.) 5.0 and compared descriptively between Arms A and B. Serious adverse events are denoted by "[SAE]".
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will assess CR without MRD by flow cytometry via Hematologics, Inc. compare descriptively between Arms A and B.
Time frame: From day 1 of liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine until no response is achieved, relapse or death, will be assessed for up to 5 years
Will be compared between Arms A and B.
Time frame: From CR/CRi until relapse or death, assessed at 2 years
Will be compared between Arms A and B.
Time frame: From CR/CRi until relapse or death, assessed up to 5 years
Will be compared between Arms A and B.
Time frame: From randomization until death or last follow-up, assessed up to 5 years
Will be compared between Arms A and B.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be compared between Arms A and B.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
Randomized Phase 2 Study of Daunorubicin and Cytarabine Liposome + Pomalidomide Versus Daunorubicin and Cytarabine Liposome in Newly Diagnosed AML With MDS-Related Changes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03862157
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, BCR-ABL1 Negative
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05364762
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06815003
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02566304
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details