Counseling
OtherReceive TIPC
Other names: Counseling Intervention
NCT Number: NCT06279013
In this clinical trial, symptom monitoring (interactive voice response [IVR] is compared to automated telephone symptom management [ATSM] and telephone interpersonal counseling [TIPC]) for reducing symptom burden and psychological distress (depressive and anxiety symptoms) among people receiving oral anti-cancer treatment. Symptoms are the number one driver of treatment interruptions and unscheduled health services use. To reduce the risk of these events, symptom monitoring and management are necessary. However, these services are not implemented routinely, especially in the community oncology settings. Further, depressive and anxiety symptoms are a key barrier to enacting symptom self-management strategies. IVR is a form of symptom monitoring where patients, when called, enter their symptom ratings over the phone. Their symptom summary is sent to their provider, and patients may be advised to reach out to their oncology provider, based on their symptoms. The ATSM intervention combines IVR assessments with a Symptom Management and Survivorship educational handbook with self-management strategies. Patients receiving ATSM enter their symptom ratings over the phone and have their symptoms reported to their provider, but patients are also directed to the handbook for strategies to manage elevated symptoms. Patients receiving ATSM who report being anxious, discouraged, or sad will also receive TIPC, which targets psychological distress and its connection to social support and interpersonal communication. Information gathered from this study may help researchers learn more about the best ways to manage patient symptoms and improve patient outcomes.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Puerto Rico Hematology Oncology Group, Bayamón, Puerto Rico
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. Test the effectiveness of Automated Telephone System Management (ATSM) + Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIPC) versus active control on patient-level outcome of the summary toxicity index of 24 Patient Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) symptoms that include depressive, anxiety, and other symptoms commonly experienced during oral anti-cancer treatment over weeks 1-12 (immediate effect) and 13-17 (sustained effect).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
I. Test the effectiveness of ATSM+TIPC versus active control on patient-level outcome of unscheduled health services over weeks 1-12 and 13-17.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. Evaluate implementation outcomes at the practice personnel level (physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, advanced practice providers, physician assistants, medical assistants, pharmacists, social workers, and other behavioral health professionals):
Ia. Feasibility of implementation of the automated telephone symptom monitoring and TIPC at the community oncology practice.
Ib. Perceptions of acceptability of the automated telephone symptom monitoring and TIPC for the community oncology practice.
Ic. Perceptions of appropriateness of the automated telephone symptom monitoring and TIPC for the community oncology practice.
II. Estimate delivery cost of the ATSM+TIPC and active control and cost savings for the ATSM+TIPC versus active control as a result of reduced unscheduled health services use.
III. Estimate the effect of the ATSM+TIPC versus active control on patient-reported financial burden.
IV. Estimate the differences in the effect of the ATSM+TIPC versus active control on the primary and secondary outcomes according to concurrent administration of oral agent with immune checkpoint inhibitor, other targeted infusion therapy, infusion chemotherapy, or radiation therapy.
OUTLINE: Practices are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive IVR symptom monitoring calls once a week for 12 weeks, and a summary symptom report is sent to their provider. Call duration is approximately 15 minutes.
ARM II: Patients receive the Symptom Management and Survivorship handbook and receive IVR symptom monitoring calls for 12 weeks, with summary symptom reports sent to their provider. Call duration is approximately 20 minutes. Patients who report anxious, discouraged, or sad mood items on their monitoring calls for two consecutive weeks between weeks 1 and 4 also receive TIPC calls for up to 8 weeks. TIPC call duration is approximately 30 minutes.
After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up during weeks 13-17 and practice personnel are assessed at intake and 12 and 25 months later.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Receive TIPC
Other names: Counseling Intervention
Receive handbook
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Other names: Chart Review
Receive IVR symptom monitoring
Other names: monitor
Ancillary studies
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks from the start of therapy (trial interventions)
Toxicity index across 24 symptoms will be measured using Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Linear mixed effects or generalized linear mixed effects models will be used.
Time frame: Up to 17 weeks from the start of therapy (trial interventions)
Questions with yes/no responses about each type of unscheduled health service use: hospitalizations, use of urgent care, use of the emergency department. If yes, number of days spent in the hospital, number of times visited urgent care or emergency department are recorded.
Time frame: Up to 25 months
Practice personnel time to address weekly IVR symptom reports will be determined based on the checklist of action and standard time to complete each action (e.g., 20 minutes to prescribe a medication). Standard times will be determined based on consensus of practice personnel as discussed during a meeting with practices. Total time will be prorated by the number of patients on trial during each month within each practice.
Time frame: Up to 25 months
Assessed using the 4-item Feasibility of Intervention Measure asked for the automated telephone system and separately for the TIPC. A higher total score indicates greater feasibility.
Time frame: Up to 25 months
Practice personnel will select items for actions taken that includes symptom-related oncology visits, oral agent treatment alterations, prescriptions of supportive care medications, and referrals to supportive care services for each patient.
Time frame: Up to 25 months
Treatment fidelity will be assessed using time spent by TIPC interveners in the automated telephone symptom management +TIPC arm and fidelity scores from the checklist that indicates time spent on calls, issues discussed, and any problems encountered for TIPC protocol.
Time frame: Up to 25 months
Measured using the total score from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure and Intervention Appropriateness Measure, each with 4 questions, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability and appropriateness, respectively.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Total costs (fixed and variable), including personnel time, fixed costs to develop software, and operating costs for the interventions will be calculated. Cost savings in each arm will be calculated using unadjusted and adjusted rates of hospitalizations and urgent care or emergency department visits based on cost data for the States where participating practices will be located.
Time frame: Up to 17 weeks from the start of therapy (trial interventions)
The COST is a patient-reported outcome measure that describes the financial distress experienced by cancer patients. It includes 12 items rated on a 5-point Likert type scale. The items are summarized into a total score per scoring instructions.
Time frame: Up to 17 weeks from the start of therapy (trial interventions)
Concurrent treatments will be collected. Each concurrent treatment will be analyzed separately for the primary and secondary outcome measures.
NRG Oncology
Other
Managing Symptoms and Psychological Distress During Oral Anti-Cancer Treatment
Acronym: SYMON
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07285044
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07235501
Graft Versus Host Disease, Graft vs Host Disease
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06513962
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06941324
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details