Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi
Van, 65080, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06757322
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical success and efficacy of single-needle, double-cannula arthrocentesis with conventional arthrocentesis techniques in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders. Patients with nonreducible disc displacement complained of limited mouth opening and/or pain. All treated patients had baseline and follow-up (with mouth opening and VAS). Comparisons were made within and between groups.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Van, 65080, Turkey (Türkiye)
The patients included in the study were evaluated in the preoperative, 1week, 1-3, and 6 months after the procedure. Double-needle group: two needles were inserted into the joint and washed. In the single-needle group, two needles were bent (from their lower parts) before the procedure and their pointed ends were joined by placing acrylic on the plastic parts from a single point. The resulting combined needle was directed to the upper joint space and washed. 13 underwent single-needle double cannula arthrocentesis and 15 underwent double needle arthrocentesis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Artocentesis describes the lavage of the TMJ by introducing a saline/ringer lactate solution through a needle inserted into the upper joint cavity. TMJ arthrocentesis was first introduced as a double needle entry method by Nitzan et al in 1991. The single needle technique was developed by Singh and Varghese and introduced in 2013. The single needle method is a more simplified modification of the first method.
Artocentesis describes the lavage of the TMJ by introducing a saline/ringer lactate solution through a needle inserted into the upper joint cavity. TMJ arthrocentesis was first introduced as a double needle entry method by Nitzan et al in 1991.
Time frame: Until the 6th month after TMJ Arthrocentesis
The maximum mouth opening of the patients was noted in centimeters before arthrocentesis and in the control sessions, and the changes between the sessions were compared.
Time frame: Until the 6th month after TMJ Arthrocentesis
The VAS pain assessments of the patients before and during the arthrocentesis and control sessions were noted and changes between sessions were compared. The VAS score is an assessment in which we note the patient's pain assessment between 0 and 10. '0' means no pain, while '10' means the worst possible pain. As the number increases, it indicates that the patient's pain increases.
Yuzuncu Yil University
Other
Comparison of Single Needle-Double Cannula and Double Needle Arthrocentesis in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06473376
Craniomandibular Disorders, Jaw Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07614932
Craniomandibular Disorders, Jaw Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07523451
TMJ Disc Disorder
Alexandria, Alexandria Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07452289
TMJ Disc Disorder
Alexandria, Azarita, Egypt
View Trial Details