Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07678216

Comparing Sedatives for Intracranial Pressure Control in Traumatic Brain Injury

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of propofol, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine on intracranial pressure control and clinical outcomes in adults with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury undergoing urgent neurosurgical intervention.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Which sedative agent provides better control of intracranial pressure, assessed by optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), during the first 24 hours after neurosurgical intervention? * How do the three sedative agents compare in achieving target sedation depth, maintaining hemodynamic stability, and improving short-term clinical outcomes such as ICU mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU length of stay?

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive propofol, midazolam, or dexmedetomidine for 24 hours of continuous sedation. Clinical, hemodynamic, and neurological outcomes will be assessed and compared among the three study groups.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Aswan University Hospital

Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 81528, Egypt

Location contact

Mohamed Abdelhamed, M.Sc.

CONTACT

[email protected]

01061651065

About this study

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide. Prevention of secondary brain injury through optimal control of intracranial pressure (ICP) is a key component of intensive care management in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI. Sedative agents are routinely used to facilitate mechanical ventilation, reduce cerebral metabolic demand, and improve ICP control. However, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal sedative agent for this patient population.

Propofol, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine are among the most commonly used sedatives in neurocritical care. Each agent has distinct pharmacological characteristics that may influence intracranial pressure, hemodynamic stability, neurological assessment, and clinical outcomes. Despite widespread use, direct comparative evidence between these agents remains limited.

This prospective randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of propofol, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine on intracranial pressure control and clinical outcomes in adult patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury undergoing urgent neurosurgical intervention. Intracranial pressure will be assessed noninvasively using serial optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurements obtained by ocular ultrasonography during the first 24 hours of continuous sedation.

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the three sedative regimens according to a standardized protocol targeting a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4. Standard neurocritical care management and analgesia protocols will be applied to all study groups.

The study will evaluate the comparative effects of the three sedative agents on intracranial pressure control, sedation quality, hemodynamic stability, adverse events, secondary brain injury, and short-term clinical outcomes. The findings are expected to provide evidence to guide sedative selection in patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury, particularly in settings where invasive intracranial pressure monitoring is not routinely available.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury with post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤12
  • Undergone urgent neurosurgical intervention (craniotomy, craniectomy, or ICP monitor placement) within 24 hours of injury
  • Admitted to ICU and expected to require continuous sedation
  • Hemodynamically stable or stabilized (defined as MAP ≥65 mmHg with vasopressor requirement ≤0.1 mcg/kg/min norepinephrine equivalent)
  • Informed consent obtained from legally authorized representative

Exclusion criteria

  • The Relative refusal to participate in the research.
  • Known allergy or contraindication to propofol, midazolam, or dexmedetomidine
  • Pre-existing neurological disorders (epilepsy, prior stroke, brain tumors, dementia) that may interfere with outcome assessment
  • Severe hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh Class C) or acute liver failure
  • Severe renal dysfunction (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m² or requiring renal replacement therapy)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring norepinephrine >0.1 mcg/kg/min or equivalent vasopressor support
  • Heart rate <50 bpm or second/third-degree AV block without pacemaker (relative contraindication for dexmedetomidine)
  • Clinical determination of brain death or expected survival <24 hours
  • Enrollment in another interventional trial
  • Severe polytrauma requiring ongoing surgical interventions that would interfere with protocol adherence

Treatment and study plan

Propofol

Drug

Continuous intravenous propofol infusion initiated at 1 mg/kg/h and titrated within a range of 1-4 mg/kg/h to maintain a target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4 during the 24-hour study intervention period.

midazolam

Drug

Continuous intravenous midazolam infusion initiated at 0.03 mg/kg/h and titrated within a range of 0.02-0.1 mg/kg/h to maintain a target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4 during the 24-hour study intervention period. An initial bolus dose of 0.05 mg/kg may be administered if rapid sedation is required.

Dexmedetomidine

Drug

Continuous intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion initiated at 0.4 μg/kg/h and titrated within a range of 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/h to maintain a target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4 during the 24-hour study intervention period. No loading dose will be administered.

Primary outcomes

  1. Intracranial Pressure Control Assessed by Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter (ONSD)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after initiation of sedation

    Intracranial pressure control will be evaluated using serial optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurements obtained by ocular ultrasonography. The primary outcome will be the mean ONSD over the 24-hour intervention period, analyzed as a continuous measure of intracranial pressure control.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Time at Target Sedation Level

    Time frame: 24 hours after initiation of sedation

    Percentage of assessment time during which patients maintained the target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale ranges from +4 (combative) to -5 (unarousable). Higher scores indicate greater agitation, whereas lower scores indicate deeper sedation. The target sedation level for this study is RASS -3 to -4.

  2. Mean Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) Score

    Time frame: 24 hours after initiation of sedation

    Mean Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score during the 24-hour intervention period. The RASS ranges from +4 (combative) to -5 (unarousable), with target sedation defined as -3 to -4.

  3. Need for Rescue Sedation

    Time frame: 24 hours after initiation of sedation

    Proportion of patients requiring rescue sedation due to failure to achieve target sedation despite maximum protocol dose.

  4. Time to Achieve Target Sedation

    Time frame: 24 hours after initiation of sedation

    Time from initiation of study sedative infusion until achievement of target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score (-3 to -4).The RASS ranges from +4 (combative) to -5 (unarousable)

  5. Incidence of Hypotension

    Time frame: 24 hours after initiation of study sedation

    Incidence of hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mmHg or cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) <60 mmHg.

  6. Vasopressor Requirements

    Time frame: 24 hours after initiation of study sedation.

    Vasopressor requirements assessed by the proportion of patients requiring vasopressor support.

  7. Incidence of Bradycardia.

    Time frame: 24 hours after initiation of study sedation.

    Percentage of participants who develop bradycardia, defined as a sustained heart rate <50 beats per minute (bpm).

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Developed Secondary Brain Injury ✅

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours after initiation of study sedation.

    Secondary brain injury will be assessed by the presence of new or progressive findings on brain computed tomography (CT) compared with baseline imaging, including new intracranial hemorrhage, progression of cerebral edema (defined as >25% increase in midline shift or worsening basal cistern effacement), new cerebral infarction, or transtentorial or uncal herniation. Brain CT scans will be reviewed by a blinded neuroradiologist.

  9. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

    Time frame: From initiation of mechanical ventilation until successful extubation, assessed for up to 30 days.

    Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, measured as the number of days from initiation of mechanical ventilation until successful liberation from ventilatory support.

  10. Time to Neurological Awakening

    Time frame: From discontinuation of study sedation until achievement of a Glasgow Coma Scale motor score of ≥5, assessed for up to 30 days.

    Time from discontinuation of study sedation to achievement of a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) motor score of ≥5. The Glasgow Coma Scale motor component ranges from 1 (no motor response) to 6 (obeys commands), with higher scores indicating better neurological function.

  11. ICU Mortality

    Time frame: From ICU admission until ICU discharge, assessed for up to 30 days.

    Death from any cause during the ICU stay following urgent neurosurgical intervention for traumatic brain injury.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mohamed Abdelhamed, M.Sc

CONTACT

[email protected]

+201061651065

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Aswan University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Propofol, Midazolam, and Dexmedetomidine on Intracranial Pressure and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Undergoing Urgent Neurosurgical Intervention

Acronym: ICP-TBI

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jul 1, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.