University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X6, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05589701
This is a single institutional registry-based, prospective, observational study to describe radiation oncologists' decision making during evaluation of patients and to compare real-world outcomes of SBRT vs CRT.
A registry-based trial involves observing the effect of something without manipulating it.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–100 year
All sexes
Observational
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X6, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
The purpose of this study is to study the differences between CRT and SBRT. The investigator's are assessing radiation oncologists' decision-making during the evaluation of patients with spinal metastases by requesting radiation oncologists complete a questionnaire. Additionally, the investigator's will compare outcomes, including local progression, pain response and overall survival between SBRT and CRT. By collecting this information, the investigator's will develop an evidence-based algorithm that may be used to support medical decision-making for others with spinal metastases in the future.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Standard of care radiotherapy administered as per institutional guidelines.
Time frame: 2 years
Physician's decision making will be assessed by a questionnaire containing 6 questions, including questions on variations of practice and the role of a number of factors that may influence a physician's recommendation for spine metastasis patients requiring radiation (SBRT vs CRT).
Time frame: 2 years
Based on available imaging, compare local progression free survival outcomes of patients treated with SBRT vs CRT.
Time frame: 2 years
Using a patient reported scale (0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)), compare pain outcomes of patients treated with SBRT vs CRT.
Time frame: 2 years
Compare adverse events, collected through standard of care follow up, which occur for patients treated with SBRT vs CRT.
Time frame: 2 years
Compare overall survival, collected through medical records, for patients treated with SBRT vs CRT.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University Health Network, Toronto
Other
Prospective Registry Trail COMparing Stereotactic Body Radiotherpy (SBRT) to Conventional PAlliative RadioTherapy (CRT) in Patients With Spinal Metastases
Acronym: COMBAT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06173401
Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasms
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05575323
Spinal Metastases
Utrecht, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT07429422
Bone Metastases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Ljubljana, Slovenia
View Trial DetailsNCT06548061
Spinal Metastases
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
View Trial Details