Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo collection of blood samples
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT05773274
This phase II trial compares the effect of retreatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) to the usual approach of treatment with everolimus, sunitinib, or cabozantinib in patients who have previously received 177Lu-DOTATATE for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEPNET) that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic) and that cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable). PRRT is a type of radiation therapy for which a radioactive chemical is linked to a peptide (small protein) that targets tumor cells. When this radioactive peptide is injected into the body, it binds to a specific receptor found on some tumor cells. The radioactive peptide builds up in these cells and helps kill the tumor cells without harming normal cells. In this trial 177Lu-DOTATATE is used for PRRT. 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT may increase the length of time until worsening of the GEPNET compared to the usual approach. Everolimus is in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. It is also a type of angiogenesis inhibitor. Everolimus works by stopping tumor cells from reproducing and by decreasing blood supply to the tumor cells. Sunitinib and cabozantinib, block certain proteins, which may help keep tumor cells from growing. They may also prevent the growth of new blood vessels that tumors need to grow. Sunitinib malate is a type of tyrosine kinase inhibitor and a type of antiangiogenesis agent. Retreating with 177Lu-DOTATATE may work better than everolimus, sunitinib or cabozantinib in shrinking or stabilizing tumors in patients with metastatic and unresectable GEPNET who were previously treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
BCCA-Vancouver Cancer Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate the effect of lutetium Lu 177 dotatate (177Lu-DOTATATE) versus (vs.) everolimus or sunitinib (for pancreatic neuroendocrine [NET] patients only) or cabozantinib (United States [US] patients only) on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic/unresectable GEPNET who have progressed following previous peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the toxicity and safety of 177Lu-DOTATATE and everolimus or sunitinib (for pancreatic neuroendocrine NET patients only) or cabozantinib (US patients only).
II. To determine the effect of 177Lu-DOTATATE vs. everolimus or sunitinib (for pancreatic neuroendocrine NET patients only) or cabozantinib (US patients only) on overall response rate (ORR).
III. To evaluate the effect of 177Lu-DOTATATE vs. everolimus or sunitinib (for pancreatic neuroendocrine NET patients only) or cabozantinib (US patients only) on overall survival (OS).
IV. To evaluate post progression survival (PPS) and time to second objective disease progression (PFS2) for patients randomized to Arm 2 of the study and crossed over to Arm 1 at time of objective progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1.
V. To evaluate the effect of 177Lu-DOTATATE vs. everolimus or sunitinib (for pancreatic neuroendocrine NET patients only) or cabozantinib (US patients only) on patient quality of life (QoL).
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive 177Lu-DOTATATE intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes every 8 weeks (Q8W). Treatment repeats for two cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT) scan and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and collection of blood samples while on study.
ARM II: Patients receive everolimus orally (PO) on a daily basis (QD), sunitinib PO QD or cabozantinib PO QD. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Patients whose cancer worsens may cross over to ARM I. Patients also undergo CT scan and/or MRI and collection of blood samples while on study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 12 weeks until objective disease progression and then every 6 months until death.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo collection of blood samples
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
Given PO
Undergo CT scan
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan Service Type, tomography
Given PO
Other names: 42-O-(2-Hydroxy)ethyl Rapamycin, Afinitor, Certican, RAD 001, RAD-001, RAD001, Votubia, Zortress
Given IV
Other names: 177 Lu-DOTA-TATE, 177 Lu-DOTA-Tyr3-Octreotate, 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate, Lutathera, Lutetium (177Lu) Oxodotreotide, Lutetium Lu 177 DOTA(0)-Tyr(3)-Octreotate, Lutetium Lu 177-DOTA-Tyr3-Octreotate, lutetium Lu 177-DOTATATE, Lutetium Oxodotreotide Lu-177
Undergo MRI
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Given PO
Time frame: From randomization to any documented evidence of tumour progression or death from any cause, assessed up to 3 years
The PFS of patients of both treatment groups will be described by Kaplan-Meier method and the median PFS will be estimated using the same method. A one-sided stratified log-rank test adjusting for the stratification factor at randomization will be the primary method to compare the difference in PFS between the experimental and control treatments, at the 5% level. A stratified Cox model adjusting for duration of durable response to the initial peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (durable response >= 24 months versus [vs.] < 24 months) at randomization and with one single treatment covariate will be used to estimate the hazard ratio and associated one-sided 95% confidence interval. Sensitivity analysis adjusting for all three stratification factors at randomization will also be performed.
Time frame: From randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 3 years
The OS of patients of both treatment groups will be described by Kaplan-Meier method and the median OS will be estimated using the same method. A one-sided stratified log-rank test adjusting for the stratification factor at randomization will be the primary method to compare the difference in OS between the experimental and control treatments, at the 5% level. A stratified Cox model adjusting for the stratification factor at randomization and with one single treatment covariate will be used to estimate the hazard ratio and associated one-sided 95% confidence interval.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Defined as the proportion of patients with a documented complete response and partial response based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. The primary estimate of ORR will be based on all patients randomized. A Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for the duration of durable response to the initial peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (durable response >= 24 months vs. < 24 months) at the time of randomization will be used to compare the objective response rates between two arms and sensitivity analysis adjusting for all three stratification factors at randomization will also be performed.
Time frame: From objective progression on everolimus to objective progression or death from any cause after cross-over to receive 177Lu-DOTATATE, assessed up to 3 years
Median PPS and associated two-sided 90% confidence interval will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From randomization to objective tumor progression or death from any cause after the cross-over, assessed up to 3 years
Median PFS2 and associated two-sided 90% confidence interval will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
NET RETREAT: A Phase II Study of 177 Lutetium-DOTATATE Retreatment vs. Everolimus or Sunitinib or Cabozantinib in Metastatic/Unresectable Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03375320
Adenoma, Adenoma, Islet Cell
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01841736
Foregut Neuroendocrine Tumor, Hindgut Neuroendocrine Tumor
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00454363
Adenocarcinoma, Adenoma
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01010126
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details