Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06745024

Comparing Radiation Therapy to Usual Treatment for Patients With High-Risk Bone Metastases That Are Not Causing Pain, PREEMPT Trial

This phase III trial compares the effect of adding radiation therapy to usual treatment on the occurrence of bone-related complications in cancer patients with high-risk bone metastases that are not causing symptoms, such as pain (asymptomatic). High-risk bone metastases are defined by their location (including hip, shoulder, long bones, and certain levels of the spine), or size (2 cm or larger). These bone metastases appear to be at higher risk of complications such as fracture, spinal cord compression, and/or pain warranting surgery or radiation treatment. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. The total dose of radiation can be delivered in a single day or divided in smaller doses for up to 5 days of total treatment. Usual treatment for asymptomatic bone metastases may include drugs that prevent bone loss, in addition to the treatment for the primary cancer or observation (which means no treatment until symptoms appear). Evidence has shown that preventative radiation therapy may be effective in lowering the number of bone metastases-related complications, however, it is not known if this approach is superior to usual care. Adding radiation therapy to usual treatment may be more effective in preventing bone-related complications than usual care alone in cancer patients with asymptomatic high-risk bone metastases.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

University Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine whether prophylactic radiation therapy (RT) to high-risk asymptomatic bone metastases decreases the occurrence of skeletal-related events (SREs), including pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, and surgery to bone (not including palliative radiation for pain only), compared to standard of care (SOC).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare overall survival (OS) between study arms. II. To compare occurrence of any SREs (including RT for palliation of pain) among enrolled bone metastasis(es) between study arms.

III. To compare occurrence of hospitalizations related to any SREs in enrolled bone metastasis(es) between study arms.

IV. To compare pain-related quality of life (QOL) between study arms. V. To characterize adverse events of RT and compare to SOC.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate overall QOL, functional status, and quality-adjusted life years between study arms.

II. To evaluate any hospitalizations (from any cause) between study arms. III. To characterize differences in primary and secondary endpoints between study arms (a) among the represented racial and ethnic groups (e.g. Black, White, Hispanic/Latino, Asian/Pacific Islander, and Native American), (b) by sex, and (c) by health-related social needs.

IV. To evaluate the heterogeneity of radiation treatment effect based on cancer-related factors (histology, criteria indicating high-risk for SRE), treatment-related factors (bone modifying agent use, radiation dose/technique), and patient demographic factors (age, sex, race, ethnicity, and health-related social needs).

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients continue to receive SOC systemic anti-cancer therapy or observation and bone modifying agents as determined by the treating physician. Additionally, patients undergo optional blood sample collection on study.

ARM II: Patients continue SOC as in Arm I. Patients also undergo conventional RT or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) once daily (QD) for up to 5 days (5 fractions) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for RT planning and optional blood sample collection on study.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with polymetastatic cancer defined as more than 5 sites of radiographically-evident systemic metastatic disease (excluding intracranial disease)
  • "High-risk" asymptomatic bone metastasis(es) (defined as pain score of < 5 on a 0-10 scale using question #3 from the Brief Pain Inventory [BPI]) defined as fulfilling at least one of the following four high-risk criteria:
  • Bulky site of disease in bone (>= 2 cm);
  • Disease involving the hip (acetabulum, femoral head, femoral neck), shoulder (acromion, glenoid, humeral head), or sacroiliac joints;
  • Disease in long bones occupying up to 2/3 of the cortical thickness (humerus, radius, ulna, clavicle, femur, tibia, fibula, metacarpals, phalanges); and/or
  • Disease in junctional spine (C7-T1, T12-L1, L5-S1) and/or disease with posterolateral element (pedicles and/or facet joints) involvement.

NOTES:

  • Patients may have up to 3 individual high-risk bone metastases enrolled in the study. Sternum, rib, and scapula are defined as flat bones so lesions in these locations would only be included if bulky (per high-risk criteria #1)
  • Question #3 from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): "On a scale of 0-10, 0 being no or least amount of pain, and 10 being the worst pain imaginable, what score would you rate your worst pain in the last 24 hours."
  • The pain score can be lesion-specific and does not need to refer to overall pain.
  • The remaining questions on the BPI are not required to confirm eligibility
  • Patients with any solid tumor type (excluding multiple myeloma and lymphoma)
  • Patients must have systemic disease evaluation through standard of care diagnostic imaging, including either CT chest/abdomen/pelvis or body positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, with radiology report available
  • Patients with treated brain metastases and no known leptomeningeal disease are eligible if these lesions have been treated prior to enrollment
  • Age ≥ 18
  • Performance status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2 or Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 60
  • No previous radiotherapy to the intended enrolled sites of disease
  • No epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) ≥ grade 1c (defined as deformation of the thecal sac with spinal cord abutment) at the enrolled bone metastasis(es)
  • No prior fracture at the enrolled bone metastasis(es)

Treatment and study plan

Best Practice

Other

Given SOC systemic anti-cancer therapy

Other names: standard of care, standard therapy

Biospecimen Collection

Procedure

Undergo blood sample collection

Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection

Bone Metastases Treatment

Other

Given bone modifying agent

Computed Tomography

Procedure

Undergo CT

Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan Service Type, tomography

Conventional Radiotherapy

Procedure

Undergo conventional RT

Other names: 2-Dimensional Conventional Radiation Therapy, 2D Conventional Radiotherapy, 2D Radiotherapy, 2D-RT, Radiation, 2D Conventional

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Procedure

Undergo MRI

Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI

Patient Observation

Other

Undergo SOC observation

Other names: Active Surveillance, deferred therapy, expectant management, Observation, Watchful Waiting

Questionnaire Administration

Other

Ancillary studies

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Radiation

Undergo SBRT

Other names: SABR, SBRT, Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs) (Excluding palliative radiation for pain)

    Time frame: From randomization until first SRE up to 24 months

    Gray's test will be used to test for statistically significant difference in the distribution of SRE failure times (Gray 1988), accounting for death as a competing risk. The cause specific Cox proportional hazards model will be used to evaluate the treatment effect and stratification variables (Cox 1972). The analysis will be conducted on an intent-to-treat basis using all randomized patients. Analyses of treatment effect will be performed using the Cox proportional hazard model with the stratification factors as fixed covariates. The adjusted estimate of the treatment hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval will be provided.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival (OS)

    Time frame: From the time of study entry until death up to 24 months

    OS will be compared between the two treatment arms. A stratified Cox proportional hazards model will be used to evaluate the treatment effect and stratification variables (Cox 1972). The analysis will be conducted on an intent-to-treat basis using all randomized patients. The adjusted estimate of the treatment hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval will be provided.

  2. Hospitalizations for SRE

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

    Hospitalization for SRE as an event will be analyzed with a logistic regression model by treatment status, adjusted for stratification factors. The adjusted estimate of the treatment odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval will be provided.

  3. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scores

    Time frame: At baseline and up to 24 months

    The mean BPI scores at each collected time point (and their 95% confidence intervals) by treatment arm will be estimated. A mixed-effects model will be used to estimate and compare the mean BPI worst pain scores for the treatment arms. Model covariates will include the patients' randomly assigned study treatment, stratification factors, baseline BPI worst pain score, any opioid use, and a treatment-by-assessment time interaction term.

  4. Incidence of adverse events (AEs)

    Time frame: Up to 42 days from registration (Arm I) and up to 30 days from end of treatment (Arm II)

    AEs will be collected using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize AEs. These analyses will focus on individuals who initiated their assigned treatment and will summarize maximum grade of AEs occurring during treatment and follow-up classified by CTCAE category. The primary summary of AEs will present counts and percentages, regardless of whether the AE was attributed to any of the study agents.

Other outcomes

  1. Overall quality of life, functional status, and quality-adjusted life years

    Time frame: At baseline and up to 24 months

    Comparison of overall quality of life between the arms will be evaluated using the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level (EQ-5D-5L) scale. Analyses of the EQ-5D-5L is primarily descriptive and involves estimating differences in mean scores for each treatment group with confidence intervals. A mixed-effects model will be used to estimate and compare the mean scores for the treatment groups across time. Model adjustment covariates will include the patients' randomly assigned study treatment, stratification factors, baseline EQ-5D-5L score and assessment time.

  2. Hospitalizations (from any cause)

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

    Hospitalizations from any cause as an event will be analyzed with a logistic regression model by treatment status, adjusted for stratification factors. The adjusted estimate of the treatment odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval will be provided.

  3. Treatment differences by race and ethnicity, sex, and health-related social needs

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

    Differences in primary and secondary endpoints will be characterized descriptively only. Estimates of the primary outcome treatment effect and the corresponding 95% confidence interval will be provided by sex, race, and ethnicity.

  4. Heterogeneity of radiation treatment effects

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

    Sociodemographic variables collected at baseline will be evaluated for potential interaction with radiation treatment.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NRG Oncology

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Asymptomatic Bone Metastases: A Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial (PREEMPT)

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Dec 20, 2024
Registry last updated
Jun 25, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.