Cyclophosphamide
DrugGiven IV
NCT Number: NCT05303792
This phase II trial compares the combination of inotuzumab ozogamicin and low intensity chemotherapy and blinatumomab to the usual chemotherapy with blinatumomab in treating patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a monoclonal antibody, called inotuzumab, linked to a drug, called CalichDMH. Inotuzumab is a form of targeted therapy because it attaches to specific molecules (receptors) on the surface of cancer cells, known as CD22 receptors, and delivers CalichDMH to kill them. Chemotherapy drugs work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. A monoclonal antibody, such as blinatumomab, is a type of protein that can bind to certain targets in the body, such as molecules that cause the body to make an immune response (antigens). Giving inotuzumab ozogamicin with chemotherapy and blinatumomab may help shrink the cancer and stop it from returning.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me50 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
San Juan City Hospital, San Juan, Puerto Rico
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare measurable residual disease (MRD) negative event-free survival (EFS) rate of the experimental arm (A) to standard arm (B) with EFS defined as time from randomization to occurrence of an event.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine overall response rate (complete response [CR] + complete remission with partial hematologic recovery [CRh] + complete remission with incomplete platelet counts [CRp] + complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery [CRi]) at designated time points (after cycle 1, after cycle 2, end of blinatumomab [blina]-1, end of intensive phase/blina-4) in each treatment arm.
II. To determine rate of flow cytometry MRD-negativity (undetectable or detectable < 10^-4) at designated time points (after cycle 1, after cycle 2, end of blina-1, end of intensive phase/blina-4) in each treatment arm.
III. To compare MRD response by central aspirate multiparameter flow cytometry (Wood lab) Children's Hospital of Los Angeles [CHLA]) to next generation sequencing MRD assessment (clonoSEQ, Adaptive) of blood and bone marrow at designated time points (after cycle 1, after cycle 2, and end of blina-1) and to determine association with outcome, (EFS, disease free survival [DFS], overall survival [OS]) in each treatment arm.
IV. To determine the event-free survival (EFS) standard-definition (event defined as failure to achieve morphologic remission by end of cycle 2, hematologic relapse, death), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) of each arm (median, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year) in each treatment arm.
V. To determine proportion of patients who proceed to allogeneic transplant after initial response (without intervening salvage therapy) in each treatment arm.
VI. To determine rate of liver toxicity (grade 3-5 alanine aminotransferase [ALT] increase, aspartate aminotransferase [AST] increase, bilirubin increase, alkaline phosphatase increase).
VII. To describe the safety and tolerability of each arm including rate of grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicity and treatment-related mortality (grade 5 toxicity VIII. To determine rate of delays in intensive-phase chemotherapy due to neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (in responding patients).
IX. To assess the baseline variations in comorbidity burden, physical, nutritional, and cognitive function of the study participants, and explore the association between comorbidity burden, physical, nutritional, and cognitive function, and the outcomes of therapy (grade 3-5 non-hematological toxicities, and OS).
X. To explore the longitudinal changes in physical, nutritional, and cognitive function among the experimental and control groups.
XI. To compare the burden of patient-reported symptomatic adverse events between treatment arms using the Patient Reported Outcomes - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).
XII. To correlate specific karyotype groups (normal or various primary and secondary chromosomal abnormalities) with clinical and laboratory parameters.
XIII. To correlate specific karyotype groups with response rates, response duration, MRD, and survival in patients treated on this study.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A:
INDUCTION/CONSOLIDATION:
*CHEMOTHERAPY (CHEMO) CYCLE 1: Patients receive inotuzumab ozogamicin intravenously (IV) over 1 hour on days 2 and 8, cyclophosphamide IV over 3 hours every 12 hours (Q12H) on days 1-3, vincristine IV on days 1 and 8, dexamethasone IV or orally (PO) on days 1-4 and 11-14. Patients with leukemic blasts expressing >= 20% CD20 also receive rituximab IV on days 2 and 8. Patients receive methotrexate intrathecally (IT) on day 2 and cytarabine IT on day 8.
CHEMO CYCLE 2: Patients will receive inotuzumab ozogamicin IV over 1 hour on days 2 and 8, methotrexate IV over 24 hours on day 1, cytarabine IV over 3 hours Q12H on days 2-3, and methylprednisolone IV over 2 hours Q12H on days 1-3. Patients with leukemic blasts expressing >= 20% CD20 also receive rituximab IV on days 2 and 8. Patients also receive cytarabine IT on day 2 and methotrexate IT on day 8.
MAINTENANCE: Patients receive vincristine IV on day 1, prednisone PO daily on days 1-5, mercaptopurine PO twice daily (BID) on days 1-28, and methotrexate PO weekly. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 24 cycles or 2 years, whichever comes first, in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and blood sample collection throughout the study.
ARM B:
INDUCTION/CONSOLIDATION:
MAINTENANCE: Patients receive vincristine IV on day 1, prednisone PO daily on days 1-5, mercaptopurine PO BID on days 1-28, and methotrexate PO weekly. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 24 cycles or 2 years, whichever comes first, in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and blood sample collection throughout the study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 2 months until 1 year after completion of therapy, every 3 months until 2 years after completion of therapy, and then every 6 months until 5 years from study registration.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV or PO
Given IV
Given IV or PO
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Given PO
Given PO
Given IV
Time frame: From randomization to failure to achieve MRD negative complete response (CR) after two cycles of chemotherapy, relapse, removal from protocol therapy due to toxicity prior to achievement of MRD assessed at 3 months.
Will be evaluated using the methods of Kaplan-Meier as well as Cox regression models.
Time frame: Time from achieving a CR/ complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) to the time of relapse and/or death, assessed up to 5 years
Will be evaluated using the methods of Kaplan-Meier as well as Cox regression models.
Time frame: From randomization to the time of death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Will be evaluated using the methods of Kaplan-Meier as well as Cox regression models.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
The proportion of patients who achieve complete remission or any response to induction therapy will be summarized as the proportion of patients who achieve any type of response to induction therapy divided by the number of all evaluable patients registered to this trial and who received at least one dose of induction therapy. Corresponding 95% binomial confidence intervals will also be calculated. In a similar manner, the investigators will also evaluate the overall induction response rates. All evaluable patients will be used for this analysis.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Overall response rate (CR/CRi, CR/complete remission with incomplete platelet counts [CRp], CR/complete remission with partial hematologic recovery [CRh]). The proportion of patients who achieve complete remission or any response to induction therapy will be summarized as the proportion of patients who achieve any type of response to induction therapy divided by the number of all evaluable patients registered to this trial and who received at least one dose of induction therapy. Corresponding 95% binomial confidence intervals will also be calculated. In a similar manner, the investigators will also evaluate the overall induction response rates. All evaluable patients will be used for this analysis.
Time frame: Up to end of cycle 8 (1 cycle = 28 days)
MRD-negativity by flow cytometry will be evaluated at designated time point (after cycle 1, after cycle 2, end of intensive phase). Will also compare MRD assessment by centralized aspirate flow cytometry (Wood lab) to next generation sequencing (clonoSEQ, Adaptive) of blood and bone marrow at designated time points; and determine association with outcome.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Event defined as failure to achieve Complete Response (CR)/Complete Remission with Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)/Complete Remission with Partial Hematological Recovery (CRh)/Complete Remission with Incomplete Platelet Counts (CRp), relapse, death.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
The proportion of patients experiencing a grade 3+ adverse events or toxicities will be described for each treatment arm, but will also be compared between the arms using Fisher's exact tests.
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Other
A Randomized Phase II Study Testing the Combination of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin and Lower Dose Chemotherapy Plus Blinatumomab Compared to Usual Chemotherapy Plus Blinatumomab for Older Adults With B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or B-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03914625
Abnormalities, Multiple, B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03959085
B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, B Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02877303
B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, B Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06710418
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial Details