Comparing Impacts of Donor Human Milk to Formula Supplementation on the Gut Microbiome of Full-term Infants

Investigators propose to conduct a pilot clinical RCT in the postpartum hospital setting examining DHM as an intervention provided to full-term infants who are exposed to Group B Streptococcus (GBS) antibiotic prophylaxis during labour. Randomization of participant infants is currently an ethical practice because DHM supplementation is not standard practice in this population; infants receive formula if supplementation of mother's own milk (MOM) is required. Additionally, randomization will allow investigators to determine causal relationships between DHM supplementation compared to formula supplementation on the infant gut microbiome. Finally, conducting research in the clinical setting will allow for pragmatic assessment of DHM as an intervention, enhancing external validity and increasing the likelihood of its implementation into healthcare systems to improve healthcare quality.

Population: The population of interest is vaginally born, full-term infants who are exposed to antibiotics in labour through IAP and whose mothers are planning on breastfeeding.

Recruitment: Mothers greater than 37 weeks' gestation admitted to the postpartum unit who test positive for GBS and deliver vaginally will be screened for participation in the study by nurses on the postpartum unit. Approximately 20% of all pregnant mothers will test positive for GBS and Alberta Health Services protocol indicates that GBS-positive mothers are given intravenous antibiotics during labour. Only mothers who receive the complete Alberta Health Services protocol will qualify for the study. Upon recruitment and completion of informed consent, infants requiring supplementation of MOM will be randomized to the control or intervention group. Investigators will randomize 60 mother-infant dyads, providing adequate power to detect overall microbiome differences (~30 in each group).

Intervention - Donor Human Milk (DHM): Infants randomized to the intervention group will receive DHM each time supplementation is required for the first 7 days of life. The exposure time of 7 days was selected due to feasibility of DHM cost, and this is the period when breastfeeding is being established and most formula supplementation occurs. Infants in the control group will receive formula when supplementation is required (standard care). All DHM in North America is pasteurized and provided through certified milk banks regulated by the Human Milk Banking Association of North America and DHM for this study will be obtained from the NorthernStar Mothers Milk Bank (NMMB).

Data Collection, Analysis, and Outcomes: The primary outcome for this pilot study will result from comparisons of DHM to formula supplementation groups for differences in microbiome signatures, such as diversity, proportions of Bifidobacteria, and proportions of pathogenic organisms. Infant stool samples will be collected from soiled diapers at one, six and 12 weeks postpartum.

Secondary outcomes include infant growth, sleep, and breastfeeding outcomes that will be collected at one, six and 12 weeks postpartum.

Inclusion criteria

• Gestation greater than 37 weeks (full-term)
• Completion of antibiotic protocol for GBS during labour
• Vaginal delivery
• Intending on breastfeeding
• Consent for infant to receive DHM
• Working understanding (proficient in reading and understanding) English
• Mother has provided signed and dated informed consent and authorization to use protected health information, as required by national and local regulations.
• In the investigator's opinion, the subject mother understands and can comply with protocol requirements, instructions, and protocol-stated restrictions, and is likely to complete the study as planned.

Exclusion criteria

• Diagnosed with clinically significant major congenital malformation that will interfere with breastfeeding or growth
• No intention to breastfeed
• Receiving extended courses of antibiotics (beyond that of the IAP in labour)