Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00099619

Comparing Exenatide and Insulin Glargine in Type 2 Diabetes Patients for Whom Insulin is the Next Appropriate Therapy

This is a study with two treatment sequences and two treatment periods that will assess the safety and efficacy of exenatide treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycemic control using metformin or sulfonylurea and for whom insulin is the next appropriate step in diabetes treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

30 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Research Site, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Treated with a stable dose of metformin or sulfonylurea for at least 3 months prior to screening.
  • HbA1c between 7.1% and 11.0%, inclusive.
  • Insulin therapy should be the next appropriate step of diabetes treatment.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) >25 kg/m2 and <40 kg/m2.

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient previously in a study involving exenatide or glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs.
  • Treated with insulin, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, or meglitinides within 3 months prior to screening.

Treatment and study plan

exenatide/insulin glargine

Drug

Subcutaneously injected exenaide 10 mcg twice daily for 16 weeks; then insulin glargine subcutaneously injected once daily for 16 weeks given in a dose that varies for individuals to achieve target glucose levels

Other names: Byetta, AC2003, syntheitc exenden-4

insulin glargine/exenatide

Drug

Subcutaneously injected insulin glargine subcutaneously injected once daily for 16 weeks given in a dose that varies for individuals to achieve target glucose levels; then exenaide 10 mcg twice daily for 16 weeks

Other names: Byetta, AC2993, synthetic exenden-4

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in HbA1c (glycosylated hemoglobin) from the baseline of the first period (16-weeks of exenatide or insulin) to the end of each 16-week period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, Week 32

    Change in HbA1c from Baseline to the end of each 16-week period. There is one 16-week period of exenatide treatment and one 16-week period of insulin glargine.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in patient-reported outcomes from Baseline to the end of each 16-week period

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, Week 32

    Change in patient-based outcomes (Hypoglycemic Fear Survey, patient-preference questionnaires [Treatment Evaluation and Treatment Preference questionnaires), Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised, Diabetes Treatment Flexibility Scale, Psychological General Well-Being Index, and the EuroQol (EQ-5D) instrument] from Baseline to the end of each 16-week exenatide or insulin glargine period

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca

Industry

Collaborators

  • Eli Lilly and Company

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy of Exenatide Compared With Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Metformin or Sulfonylurea for Whom Insulin is the Next Appropriate Therapy

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2005
Study completion
2005
First posted
Dec 20, 2004
Registry last updated
Feb 23, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.