Enhanced Cognitive-behavior therapy for adolescents with an eating disorder
BehavioralPsychotherapy
NCT Number: NCT06256380
The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of outpatient family-based treatment versus enhanced cognitive behavior therapy for children and adolescents with eating disorders.
Because of insufficient recruitment, the study design was modified on December 1st, 2025, to a partially randomized preference design.
The main aim is to determine if enhanced cognitive behavior therapy has a similar efficacy as family-based treatment among children and adolescents with eating disorders receiving treatment in an outpatient setting. The main outcome is improvement in eating disorders psychopathology at the end of treatment.
Interested in participating?
Request Info12 year–18 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
Eating disorders (EDs) are severe mental illnesses, associated with high morbidity, increased mortality, and reduced quality of life. Despite treatment advancements, remission rates are modest. Even in specialized treatment settings offering evidence-based treatments such as family-based treatment (FBT), remission rates are about 50%. There is emerging evidence for the effectiveness of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) for adolescents with EDs. However, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has yet compared these two treatments.
The current study will compare FBT, which has proven efficacious and is currently recommended for adolescents with EDs, and the newer treatment approach of CBT-E in a large, national RCT. Young patients with all EDs (12-18 years of age) undergoing outpatient treatment from eight different clinics in Norway will be invited to participate in the study.
Because of insufficient recruitment, the study design was modified on December 1st, 2025, to a partially randomized preference design.
Primary aim:
This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of outpatient family-based treatment versus enhanced cognitive behavior therapy for children and adolescents with eating disorders. The main outcome is improvement in eating disorders psychopathology at the end of treatment.
Secondary aims:
To compare weight gain for underweight patients, changes in comorbid psychopathology including depression, self-esteem, family functioning, and quality of life at 6-and 12-months follow-up.
Potential moderators of outcome will be explored. Treatment satisfaction and experiences of the two different treatments will be investigated from the perspective of patients, parents, and clinicians. Data from the Norwegian Control and Payment of Health Reimbursements Database (KUHR), the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR), and Social Security Database will be obtained to compare the direct and indirect costs of health care utilization for the two treatments.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention.
Change in global scores on a well-validated semi-structured interview of eating disorder attitudes and behavior, the Eating Disorder Examination - Interview. Possible scores range from 0-6 where higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment.
Change in global and subscale scores on a well-validated self-report questionnaire of eating disorder attitudes and behavior, the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0-6 where higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Weight gain in kilogram. Higher weight gain means better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in global score on a well-validated self-report questionnaire of depression, the Beck Depression Inventory II. Possible scores range from 0 to 63 where higher scores mean worse symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in global score on a well-validated self-report questionnaire of anxiety, the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Possible scores range from 0 to 63 where higher scores mean worse symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in global score on a well-validated self-report measure of quality of life, Health-Related Quality of Life Index (KIDDIESCREEN 10). Possible scores range from 10 to 50 where higher scores mean better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in global score on well validated self report measure of eating disorders-specific quality of life, the Clinical Impairment assessment. Possible scores range from 0 (no impairment) to 48 (highest level of impairment).
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in global score on a well validated self-report measure of self-esteem, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale questionnaire. Scores range from 10 to 40, where higher scores mean better self-esteem.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in parent ratings of family functioning measured by the subscale score on a well validated self-report questionnaire- the McMaster Family Assessment Device, General Functioning subscale. Scores on this subscale range from 12 to 48, where higher scores means worse level of family function.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in parent ratings on the impact of eating disorder symptoms on caregiving experiences measured by a well validated, self-report measure -the Eating Disorders Symptom Impact Scale. Scores range from 0 to 96, where higher scores mean worse impact of eating disorder symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Change in parent ratings on the mental health symptoms by a well validated, self-report measure -the Hopkins symptoms checklist 25 items. Scores range from 1 to 4 where higher scores mean worse mental health symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 months after the end of treatment, 12 months after the end of treatment
Register data from the Norwegian Control and Payment of Health Reimbursements Database (KUHR), the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR), and Social Security Database.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ingrid Funderud, PhD
CONTACT
Øyvind Rø, MD
CONTACT
Oslo University Hospital
Other
Comparing Enhanced Cognitive-behavior Therapy and Family-based Treatment for Adolescents With an Eating Disorder: a Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: CogFam
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06800807
Anorexia Nervosa, Binge-Eating Disorder
Oggebbio, Verbania, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07348432
Autoimmune Diseases, Behavior
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05587127
Appetite Regulation, Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06942858
Anorexia Nervosa, Feeding and Eating Disorders
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial Details