Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05561231

Comparing Ease of Endotracheal Intubation Using C Blade and D Blade of CMAC Videolaryngoscope in Patients Undergoing Elective Cervical Spine Surgery

This study was done to compare the ease of tracheal intubation using the conventional C blade and the D blade of CMAC videolaryngoscope in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital

Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India

About this study

Manual in-line stabilisation is used to immobilise the neck during endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery to prevent secondary spinal cord damage. This makes visualisation of the glottis difficult with conventional laryngoscopy which can be overcome with videolaryngoscope. CMAC Videolaryngoscope has the conventional blade (C blade) and the highly angulated D blade which was introduced to aid in difficult airway. This study was done to compare the ease of tracheal intubation using the conventional C blade and the D blade of CMAC videolaryngoscope in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.

Methodology: After Institutional Ethics Committee approval and obtaining informed consent, 68 patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery were randomised into 2 groups - C (intubated with C blade) or D (intubated with D blade) (n=34 each) by computer generated randomisation. After induction of general anaesthesia, manual in-line stabilisation of the cervical spine was achieved and intubation was attempted by experienced anaesthesiologist with the C blade or D blade according to the group. The time taken for successful intubation, time taken for optimum glottic visualisation, the number of attempts, additional manouvres required for successful intubation and the incidence of complications were compared.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiology) grade one and two,
  • aged 18 years and older,
  • Patients with mouth opening more than two and a half fingers (inter-incisor distance >3cm)

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who were unwilling to be a part of the study,
  • patients with any oral pathology, hiatus hernia, pregnant women,
  • patients with severe systemic diseases

Treatment and study plan

Intubation with C blade

Procedure

Intubation with C blade of CMAC videolaryngoscope

Intubation with D blade

Procedure

Intubation with D blade of CMAC videolaryngoscope

Primary outcomes

  1. Time taken for successful intubation

    Time frame: During procedure

    Comparing the time taken for successful intubation using the C blade and D blade of CMAC videolaryngoscope in patients with manual in-line stabilisation of the cervical spine

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time taken to obtain the best Cormack-Lehane grade

    Time frame: During procedure

    Comparing the time taken to obtain the best Cormack-Lehane grade using the C blade and D blade of CMAC videolaryngoscope in patients with manual in-line stabilisation of the cervical spine

  2. Number of attempts, external manouvres, complications

    Time frame: During procedure

    Comparing the number of attempts for successful endotracheal intubation, external manoeuvres or adjuncts required, complications caused using the C blade and D blade of CMAC videolaryngoscope in patients with manual in-line stabilisation of the cervical spine

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Single Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Endotracheal Intubation Using C Blade and D Blade of CMAC Videolaryngoscope in Patients Undergoing Elective Cervical Spine Surgery

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Sep 30, 2022
Registry last updated
Sep 30, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.