Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02911974

Comparing Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Samples for Pancreatic Masses

This is a randomized prospective clinical study comparing a fine needle biopsy device and an aspiration needle.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Center for Interventional Endoscopy - Florida Hospital

Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States

About this study

At EUS, once the pancreatic mass is identified, patients will be randomized to undergo sampling using the 22G FNA or FNB needle. All patients will undergo sampling of pancreatic masses using both needles but the needle to be used first will be based on randomization. Subsequent passes will be performed by alternate needles and once onsite diagnosis is established using either needle type, more passes will not be performed for onsite diagnostic adequacy. However, a minimum of at least one pass and a maximum of 8 passes will be performed using both needle types. The number of passes needed to achieve diagnostic adequacy using both needles will documented.

Four dedicated passes will then be performed using the initial randomization sequence for cell block. Two passes will be performed using each needle type and the specimen will be preserved in formalin and sent for cell block processing.

If the doctor cannot obtain enough tissue with the study needles, another needle with a different gauge (19 or 25) will be used. This will also be a maximum of 8 passes. Information about the number of needles used, how many passes were performed, any problems with the needles will be collected. If there is not enough tissue available from these passes to establish a diagnosis, the subject will be asked to come back at another time for a repeat procedure.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled to undergo EUS
  • Patients with solid pancreatic masses on cross-sectional imaging or with jaundice secondary to biliary obstruction
  • Able and willing to provide written or verbal consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to safely undergo EUS for any reason
  • Coagulopathy (Prothrombin time > 18 secs, platelet count < 80,000/ml)
  • Active alcohol or other drug use or significant psychiatric illness
  • Pregnancy
  • Unable or unwilling to provide consent

Treatment and study plan

Acquire EUS Biopsy Device

Device
  • At EUS, once the pancreatic mass is identified, patients will be randomized to undergo sampling using the 22G Acquire EUS Biopsy Device or Expect EUS Aspiration Needle.

Expect EUS Aspiration Needle

Device
  • At EUS, once the pancreatic mass is identified, patients will be randomized to undergo sampling using the 22G Acquire EUS Biopsy Device or Expect EUS Aspiration Needle.

Primary outcomes

  1. The total area of procured tissue between the FNA and FNB needles

    Time frame: 6 months.

    The primary objective of this study is to compare the total area of procured tissue between the FNA and FNB needles in patients undergoing EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic masses.

    Pancreatic masses sampled using the FNB needle should have a tissue area greater than the FNA needle because of the serrated design of the FNB needle tip. This will be measured using a specialized digital image analysis software.

    This hypothesis will be tested by comparing the total tissue area, tumor area within the tissue, stroma area within the tissue, tumor vs. stroma ratio and the macroscopic length of the procured tissue measured in millimeters. The total of these measurements will provide information about the area of procured tissue.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic adequacy between the FNA and FNB needles

    Time frame: 6 months

    The secondary objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic adequacy between the FNA and FNB needles in patients undergoing EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic masses.

    Pancreatic masses sampled using the FNB needle should yield diagnostic adequacy with fewer passes as they are expected to procure a greater area tissue than the FNA needle.

    This hypothesis will be tested by comparing the number of passes required to establish a onsite diagnosis using both needle types in individual patients.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AdventHealth

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Trial Comparing Fine Needle Biopsy and Fine Needle Aspiration Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound -Guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Masses

Acronym: Expect

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2018
First posted
Sep 23, 2016
Registry last updated
Feb 15, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.