Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04533893

Comparing Basic Life Support Performance With Serious Game Based Module and Simulation Based Hands on Training

The aim of this study is creating this platform and investigating whether performance evaluation of BLS trainings would be more objective compared to conventional OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) exams, if these evaluations were carried out with the platform which is combining OSCE scoring criteria with sensor data retrieved from the simulator's sensors.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–25 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University - CASE (Center of Advanced Simulation and Education)

Istanbul, Non-US/Canada, 34758, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

The participants of this study consisted of 25 volunteers among Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University students without prior knowledge of basic life support protocol. 11 Participants (44.0%) were male, 14 (56.0%) were female. The participants were informed about the study and signed consent forms before participating the study. After a brief introduction of the serious gaming module, the participants were asked to choose the self-test mode of the serious game module. The participants' number of attempts was not limited. Following serious game based training, the hands-on training module combining OSCE scoring criteria with sensor data retrieved from the simulator's sensors was used for hands-on performance evaluation. After familiarization with the system using self-training mode, the participants were asked to proceed the BLS Hands-on training app with the simulator under the supervision of the educator. The simulation sessions were also recorded in order to use these recordings for conventional OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) performance evaluation. Conventional OSCE score of each participant was obtained by watching the recorded sessions of BLS trainings.Spearman's rho correlation test was used for calculating the correlation between serious gaming, hands on training module with including sensor data from the simulator and OSCE scores.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Having no prior Basic Life Support Training

Exclusion criteria

  • Having prior Basic Life Support Training

Treatment and study plan

Medical simulator (3B Scientific Lilly Pro) and Platform combining simulator sensor data with OSCE scores

Other

Hands-on training app combining OSCE scoring criteria with sensor data retrieved from the simulator's sensors was used for hands-on performance evaluation.

Other names: Basic Life Support Serious Game Module

Primary outcomes

  1. Getting BLS(Basic Life Support Training) performance scores from serious gaming module, hands -on module with sensor data and OSCE exam on day 1.

    Time frame: One day

    Serious gaming module, hands -on module with sensor data and OSCE exam had the same scoring criteria depending European Resuscitation Council Basic Life Support 2015 Algorithm. The scores were calculated over 100 points, whereas higher scores meant better scores. The participants were considered as successful, if at least 80 points out of 100 were obtained.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Acibadem University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparing Basic Life Support Performance Data Acquired From Serious Game Based Module and Simulation Based Hands on Training Via Built in Sensors of Simulators

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Sep 1, 2020
Registry last updated
Sep 1, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.