SURGERY
OtherSurgery +/- radiation choice for endocrine therapy
NCT Number: NCT02926911
This study looks at the risks and benefits of active monitoring (AM) compared to surgery in the setting of a pragmatic prospective randomized trial for low risk DCIS. Our overarching hypothesis is that management of low-risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) using an AM approach does not yield inferior cancer or quality of life outcomes compared to surgery.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me40 year–99 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Providence Alaska Medical Center, Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment resulting from mammographic screening have been estimated to be as high as 1 in 4 patients diagnosed with breast cancer although the absence of standard definitions for measuring overdiagnosis has led to much uncertainty around this estimate. The national health care expenditure resulting from false positive mammograms and breast cancer overdiagnosis has been estimated to approach $4 billion annually. There is general consensus that much of this burden derives from the treatment of DCIS; for those estimated 40,000 women per year whose DCIS may never have progressed even without treatment, medical intervention can only harm. In those women who undergo surgical management of DCIS, there is risk of developing persistent pain at the surgical site, with estimates ranging from 25-68%. Importantly, persistent pain after lumpectomy may be as prevalent as that after total mastectomy. Persistent postsurgical pain is rated by patients as the most troubling symptom, leading to disability and psychological distress, and is often resistant to management. Although prospective population-based data have demonstrated significant patient and surgical focus on pain with remarkably high levels of chronic pain 4 and 9 months after breast surgery, much of these data have been collected in women with invasive cancer, with little data directly relevant to patients with DCIS.
The overarching hypothesis of the study is that management of low-risk DCIS using an active monitoring (AM) approach does not yield inferior cancer or quality of life outcomes compared to surgery.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Surgery +/- radiation choice for endocrine therapy
Choice for endocrine therapy
Time frame: At 2 years follow-up
To compare the number of patients that develop ipsilateral invasive cancer that received surgery to the number of patients that were placed on active monitoring after 2 years of follow-up
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Measured by Short Form (SF)-36
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Measured by five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Measured by the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scale
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) 10
Time frame: Baseline
Coping evaluated using the Brief COPE, a shortened form of the COPE Inventory, inclusive of 28 items (14 subscales).
Time frame: Baseline and at 2 years
Assessment of feelings of uncertainty using the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (Short-form), which has been used in studies of active monitoring in the prostate cancer setting.
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
To compare the impact of surgery vs. AM on the number of mastectomies performed in patients with DCIS
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
To compare the impact of surgery vs. AM on the number of breast conservation surgeries performed in patients with DCIS
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
To compare the impact of surgery vs. AM on the rate of development of contralateral invasive cancer in patients with DCIS
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
To compare the impact of surgery vs. AM on the overall survival rate in patients with DCIS
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
To compare the impact of surgery vs. AM on the breast cancer specific survival rate in patients with DCIS
Time frame: 5 and 7 year follow-up
To determine the number of DCIS patients in the surgery arm that develop ipsilateral invasive cancer
Time frame: 5 and 7 year follow-up
To determine the number of DCIS patients in the AM arm that develop ipsilateral invasive cancer
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Determine the rate of use of breast MRI imaging compared to use of other breast imaging techniques
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Determine the rate of biopsies performed during follow-up of patients with DCIS
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Determine the rate of the performance of radiation therapy on patients with DCIS
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Determine the rate of the use of chemotherapy on patients with DCIS
Time frame: 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Self-reported diary
Time frame: 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Evaluated with a drug diary
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
A modified 19-item version of the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT) Symptom Checklist will evaluate commonly reported menopausal symptoms
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Evaluated with the Brief Pain Inventory, a well-validated general measure of pain and disability worst pain, least pain, and interference
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Breast specific pain will be measured by the Breast Cancer Pain Questionnaire (BCPQ); the BCPQ includes assessment of pain severity, pain frequency (how many days/week), and pain location (breast, arm, side, axilla), from which a Pain Burden Index (PBI) can be calculated
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Body image will be evaluated by the Breast-Questionnaire, a validated instrument to evaluate outcomes following surgery, will be used to evaluate satisfaction with body image
Time frame: Years 1 through 5
The Decision Regret Scale will measure how women perceived their DCIS treatment decision. The SURE scale, which is composed of four items from the Decisional Conflict Scale will be used to measure patients' uncertainty about which treatment to choose and factors contributing to uncertainty (feeling uninformed, unclear values, and unsupported in decision-making).
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
DCIS and breast cancer knowledge will be measured with items adapted from the Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Quality Instrument (BCS-DQI) as well as questions developed specifically for a study that assessed DCIS knowledge and risk perceptions. The investigators will assess risk perceptions in women with DCIS using questions developed by Lerman and Croyle that will measure risk perceptions in relation to psychosocial outcomes in women with DCIS
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Measured by the Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Quality Instrument (BCS-DQI)
Time frame: Baseline
To assess communication with physicians about DCIS management options, the investigators will adapt items used in a prior study of surgical decision-making, including the extent to which their physician talked to them about AM vs. surgery. Additionally the investigators will ask about sources of information for the management of their DCIS
Time frame: 6 months
The investigators will adapt items from the National Health Interview Survey and the Cancer Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) Study to assess financial burden. The investigators will also ask women to Cancer Care estimate out of pocket expenses attributed to their DCIS diagnosis.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, year 1, and once a year (years 1 through 5)
Employment status will be assessed using a measure that is being added to the Alliance Patient Questionnaire as it has been tested and validated in breast cancer populations.
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Four items from the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale will be adapted to evaluate frequency (1=never; 7=always) of worries about DCIS, including concerns about future breast events and death from DCIS
Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC.
Other
Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy (COMET) Trial For Low Risk DCIS: A Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial
Acronym: COMET
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06902311
Adenocarcinoma, Breast Cancer
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01023477
Adenocarcinoma, Breast Carcinoma In Situ
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04916808
Adenocarcinoma, Breast Carcinoma In Situ
Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT02492607
Adenocarcinoma, Breast Carcinoma In Situ
's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
View Trial Details