University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07404397
The researchers are comparing two treatments for high tone pelvic floor dysfunction (HTPFD) in conjunction with pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT). The goal of this study is to find out which of two extra treatments works better for people with HTPFD when they also do regular PFPT. First, the researchers will compare a muscle relaxant medicine (cyclobenzaprine IR) to using a vibrating pelvic floor massage wand. Everyone in the study will also do pelvic floor physical therapy. The researchers want to see how these treatments affect pain, sexual health, physical ability, and overall quality of life.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Devices such as the Intimate Rose Vibrating Pelvic Floor Massage Wand are not required to indicate a phase for ClinicalTrials.gov. However, this study is marked as phase 2/3 considering the use of a study drug, Cyclobenzaprine.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will be instructed to use cyclobenzaprine IR 5mg at bedtime. We will encourage participants to take the medication in the evening/before bed to minimize potential for bothersome sedation. Participants will be given the option to begin with ½ tablet (2.5mg) if preferred and titrate to 5mg dose, with goal of minimizing sedation side effects. Participants will be instructed that they may increase to 10mg at bedtime at Day 14 if desired based on perceived benefits and side effects.
Other names: Flexeril
Participants will be instructed to use a commercially available vibrating pelvic floor massage wand for approximately 10-15 minutes at least 3 times per week, which can be titrated as needed (standard use recommendations per our pelvic physical therapists).
Pelvic floor physical therapy for HTPFD uses manual manipulation to release localized muscle tension or trigger points, improve mobility of fascia, and address orthopaedic issues such as pelvic alignment and spine/hip mobility to reduce pain and improve function.
Time frame: Baseline, 18 weeks
PROMIS pain interference 4a score is from 4 questions with score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
PROMIS pain interference 4a score is from 4 questions with score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference
Time frame: 18 weeks compared to baseline
PROMIS pain interference 4a score is from 4 questions with score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference
Time frame: Baseline, 18 weeks
PROMIS pain intensity 1a score is 1 question ranging from 0-10 and the higher the number the worse the pain.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
PROMIS pain intensity 1a score is 1 question ranging from 0-10 and the higher the number the worse the pain.
Time frame: Baseline, 18 weeks
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) overall score has six domains and a maximum score of 36, with a higher score indicating better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) overall score has six domains and a maximum score of 36, with a higher score indicating better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, 18 weeks
PROMIS Self Efficacy for Managing Symptoms SF 4a is 4 questions with scores ranging from 4-20. Highter scores indicate higher confidence in symptom management
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
PROMIS Self Efficacy for Managing Symptoms SF 4a is 4 questions with scores ranging from 4-20. Highter scores indicate higher confidence in symptom management
Time frame: Baseline, 18 weeks
For Bilateral pubococcygeus, Bilateral iliococcygeus, and Bilateral obturator internus
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
For Bilateral pubococcygeus, Bilateral iliococcygeus, and Bilateral obturator internus
Time frame: 18 weeks
The Patient Global Impression of Change is scored on a scale of 1 - 7, with a score of 1 representing that the patient was very much worse following the trial, and a score of 7 representing that the patient was very much improved following the course of the trial.
Time frame: 6 weeks
The Patient Global Impression of Change is scored on a scale of 1 - 7, with a score of 1 representing that the patient was very much worse following the trial, and a score of 7 representing that the patient was very much improved following the course of the trial.
Time frame: Up to 18 weeks
PFPT session attendance will be tracked by patient self-report
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Michigan
Other
Comparing Adjuvant Treatments for High Tone Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07038512
Cystitis, Cystitis, Interstitial
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01323829
High Tone Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details