Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03677427

Comparing 5 and 15 Fractions for Whole Breast Irradiation After Breast Conserving Surgery

Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer reduces the risk of locoregional relapse and ensures better overall survival. In recent years it has been found that hypofractionation in which the number of radiation sessions is reduced with a higher dose per session offers advantages for breast irradiation. Randomized studies showed that moderate hypofraction regimens in 15 or 16 fractions have the same effect in tumor control and toxicity, although the total dose is lower than the traditional 50 Gy in 25 fractions. In a randomized study from the United Kingdom (START-B trial) even a better disease-free survival was seen with 15 sessions than with 25 sessions and the long-term side effects were also less with the short schedule.

This project proposes a clinical trial with an accelerated radiotherapy schedule in 5 sessions. It is expected that the accelerated schedule of 5 sessions over 10-12 days will have a number of radiobiological benefits: since a higher dose per session is given over a shorter period of time, it is expected that tumor control and survival will be higher. By reducing the total treatment time, the total dose is reduced, which may result in fewer radiation-related side effects and thus improve the quality of life. Apart from these radiobiological benefits, the shorter radiotherapy program reduces the number of treatment days from 15 to 5. This is not only more comfortable for the patients, but also increases the treatment capacity of the radiotherapy department. This opens up a possibility for the use of more complex techniques with fewer side effects such as radiation in the prone position.

This project includes a randomized study comparing the accelerated schedule in 5 sessions with a hypofraction schedule of 15 sessions in patients who are irradiated on the entire breast after breast-conserving surgery. The primary endpoint is breast retraction (loss of volume) 2 years after radiotherapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Radiotherapie UZ Gent

Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000, Belgium

About this study

Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer reduces the locoregional recurrence rate and improves overall survival. In recent years, it has become clear that breast cancer cells are more sensitive to fraction dose than originally presumed. Large randomized trials confirm this hypothesis: moderate hypofractionation schemes in 15 or 16 fractions are at least equivalent in tumor control and toxicity although the total dose is lower than the traditional 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Further acceleration to 5 fractions is expected to have an even larger radiobiological advantage regarding tumor control. Additional advantages are patient comfort and a better use of radiotherapy resources. Due to capacity problems some radiotherapy departments are faced with waiting lists which not only delay the time between surgery and radiotherapy, but also interfere with the introduction of more sophisticated treatment techniques like prone whole-breast irradiation (WBI). Prone WBI has several advantages over supine WBI: less acute skin toxicity and improved breast cosmesis and reduced doses to heart and lung leading to less radiation-induced heart diseases and secondary lung cancer induction.

Hypofractionation and acceleration (shorter radiotherapy schemes with less fractions and a higher dose per fraction) are attractive both for the patient (less treatment sessions) and for the hospital (more treatment capacity and shorter waiting lists). Moderate hypofractionation in 15 or 16 fractions has been generally accepted as a valid alternative for the historical schedules of 25-30 fractions for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS). With a median follow-up of 9.9 years, the UK START-B trial showed no significant difference in locoregional control between a hypofractionated schedule of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions and a normofractionation scheme of 50 Gy in 25 fractions1. The Canadian schedule of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions was also not inferior to the 50 Gy/25 fractions after 10 years of follow-up2. Aside from the obvious advantage of shortening the overall treatment time from 5 weeks to 3 weeks, both for the patient and the radiotherapy department, there might be some radiobiological advantages too. In the START-B trial, breast shrinkage, telangiectasia and breast oedema were significantly less frequent in the hypofractionation group. Better disease free survival and overall survival were also reported in the 15 fractions group, due to less distant relapses. The superiority of hypofractionation on survival and cosmesis was not observed in the Canadian trial.

While Belgium is a country with extensive health care facilities, some countries have a limited number of radiotherapy departments and patients have to travel a long distance for radiation. In those countries the pressure to evolve to even more retracted radiotherapy schemes is high. WBI in 5 fractions of 5.7 Gy over 5 weeks was tested in the FAST trial. A first analysis after 3 years demonstrated equivalence in toxicity and tumor control in comparison with the standard prescription of 25 x 2 Gy3. This accelerated schedule is in particular attractive for older patients since they often face logistic problems (frailty, impaired mobility, transportation difficulties). This sometimes leads to omission of radiotherapy leading to a reduced breast cancer specific survival4,5. For this reason, at UZ Gent a feasibility trial was started testing a highly accelerated schedule in 5 fractions over 10-12 days in patients of 65 years or older. The investigators used the FAST-scheme for WBI (5 x 5.7 Gy), however, fractions were delivered on alternate weekdays resulting in an overall treatment time of 10 to 12 days instead of five weeks. The trial also included patients requiring a boost (5 x 6.5 Gy). With patient inclusion nearly finished, an interim analysis shows <10% grade 2-3 erythema, with only one case of moist desquamation, located at a skin fold6. In this study the investigators propose a multi-center randomized trial comparing our accelerated schedule in 5 fractions with a moderate hypofractionation scheme of 15 fractions in patients treated with WBI, and allowing a simultaneously integrated boost and regional nodal irradiation in both treatment arms. The primary endpoint is breast retraction 2 years after radiotherapy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • female patients with non-metastatic breast cancer,
  • age ≥ 18 years,
  • breast conserving surgery,
  • multidisciplinary decision of adjuvant breast irradiation,
  • informed consent obtained, signed and dated before specific protocol procedures

Exclusion criteria

  • distant metastases,
  • bilateral breast irradiation,
  • history of previous radiation treatment to the same region
  • life expectancy of less than 2 years,
  • planned reconstructive surgery,
  • conditions making toxicity evaluation difficult (e.g. skin disorders),
  • patients unlikely to comply with the protocol (e.g. inability to return for follow-up visits or unlikely to complete the study).

Treatment and study plan

Radiation

Radiation

Radiation in breast cancer

Primary outcomes

  1. radiation-induced breast retraction

    Time frame: 4 years

    The primary endpoint of the randomized trial is radiation-induced breast retraction (volume loss) measured 2 years after radiotherapy.$

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acute breast toxicity: dermatitis

    Time frame: 2 years

    Dermatitis, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

  2. Acute breast toxicity: desquamation

    Time frame: 2 years

    Desquamation, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

  3. Acute breast toxicity: breast oedema

    Time frame: 2 years

    Oedema, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

  4. Acute breast toxicity: breast symptoms

    Time frame: 2 years

    pain, sense of heaviness, itching

  5. Acute breast toxicity: dyspnoea

    Time frame: 2 years

    Dyspnoea, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

  6. Acute breast toxicity: cough

    Time frame: 2 years

    Cough, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

  7. Late toxicity other than breast retraction: breast oedema

    Time frame: 5 years

    Breast oedema, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

  8. Late toxicity other than breast retraction: telangiectasia

    Time frame: 5 years

    Telangiectasia, Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT)-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA) scales

  9. Late toxicity other than breast retraction: colour changes

    Time frame: 5 years

    Colour changes, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

  10. Late toxicity other than breast retraction: fibrosis

    Time frame: 5 years

    Fibrosis, Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT)-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA) scales

  11. Late toxicity other than breast retraction: breast symptoms

    Time frame: 5 years

    Pain, sense of heaviness, itching, color change

  12. Late toxicity other than breast retraction: dyspnoe

    Time frame: 5 years

    Dyspnoe, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

  13. Patient reported outcome measure: physical and social functioning, insomnia, pain, dyspnea and global health status from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30

    Time frame: 5 years

    One is equivalent to not at all and 4 indicates very much. For the global health status, 7 is equivalent to an excellent health status and 1 indicates a very poor health status.

  14. Patient reported outcome measure: breast and arm symptoms, future perspective from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-BR23

    Time frame: 5 years

    One is equivalent to not at all and 4 indicates the very much.

  15. Patient reported outcome measure: Breast Q: Adverse effects of radiation

    Time frame: 5 years

    Four is equivalent to no problems and 1 indicates having the problem and the problem bothers the patients a lot.

  16. Patient reported outcome measure: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression (EQ-5D-3L: descriptive system)

    Time frame: 5 years

    Level 1 is equivalent to no problems, and level 3 indicates extreme problems

  17. Locoregional tumor control

    Time frame: 10 years

    Defined as metastases in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast, axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes.

  18. Distant tumor control

    Time frame: 10 years

    Any metastases outside the ipsilateral or contralateral breast, axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes.

  19. Dose/volume parameters of targets: D02, D05, D50, D95, D100, Dmean (Gray)

    Time frame: 5 years

    Extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and associated DVH planning files.

  20. Dose/volume parameters of organs at risk: D02, D05, Dmean, V5, V10, V20, V30 (Gray)

    Time frame: 5 years

    Extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and associated DVH planning files.

  21. Additional dose/volume parameters of skin: V105% (cc), V107% (cc)

    Time frame: 5 years

    Extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and associated DVH planning files.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Ghent

Other

Collaborators

  • Kom Op Tegen Kanker

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Trial Comparing 5 and 15 Fractions for Whole Breast Irradiation After Breast Conserving Surgery

Acronym: YO-HAI5

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Sep 19, 2018
Registry last updated
Jul 21, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.