Assiut University Hospital
Asyut, 71515, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT04089124
Comparison between results of repair of cut flexor zone II under General anesthesia and Walant
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me16 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Asyut, 71515, Egypt
Cut Flexor is common injury ,has unique characters as they cannot heal without surgical treatment, unique anatomy of the tendons running through flexor tendon sheaths to function and postoperative management &mobilization to prevent adhesions and improve gliding but risk of rupture.
The hand is divided into five zones (Verdan's). Zone II is described by Bunnel as "No Man's Land" historically back to 14th century (area outside London used for executions) because it was previously believed that primary repair should not be done in this zone. After understanding of flexor tendon anatomy, biomechanics , and healing new techniques of surgery and anesthesia repair is possible with good results.
General anesthesia has been the standard technique for along time. wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet. (WALANT),using safe drugs lidocaine for anesthesia and epinephrine for hemostasis, the investigators can do operations while patient is awake.
WALANT has been recommended by some surgeons to be the next standard for repair of zone 2 injuries .
This techniques has a lot of Advantages in repair zone II as 1) intraoperative testing of the flexor repair by active movement to exclude any gap. and lets the surgeon see that the repair fits through the pulleys with active movement.
2)sheath and pulley damage are minimized, as flexor tendons are repaired through small transverse sheathotomy incisions 3) the surgeon can interview the patient during the procedure and assess the ability to comply with the postoperative regimen 4) the risks of general anesthesia are avoided in most patients. Negative effects of general anesthesia include nausea and vomiting, hospital admission for anesthesia recovery, exacerbation of comorbidity issues such as diabetes, aggressive flexion by the patient emerging from general anesthesia,and others
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
we will repair tendon of FDP only using 6 strand technique using PDS 4/0 core suture - prolene 6/0 running suture
Time frame: baseline (2 weeks, 1.5 months , 3 months , 4.5 months and 6 months .)
The functions of treated fingers were calculated using original Strickland and Glogovac criteria
Time frame: baseline
as adhesion formation, which limits active range of motion. joint contracture, tendon rupture, triggering, and pulley failure with tendon bowstringin Infection or neuroma
Time frame: baseline
if can move and use flexor tendons again or not
Time frame: 6 months
Disabilites of the Arm , Shoulder , Hand
Assiut University
Other
Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Outcomes Of Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair of the Hand Under General Anesthesia Versus Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07040631
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07199049
Eye Movements, General Anesthesia
Başakşehir, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06787196
Bone Cysts, Cysts
Selçuklu, Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT00775879
General Anesthesia
Bordeaux, France
View Trial Details