Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
NCT Number: NCT00315523
Compare the Efficacy of Levocetirizine to Montelukast in Reducing Symptoms of SAR in Sensitive Subjects Exposed to Ragweed Pollen
To compare the clinical efficacy of levocetirizine 5 mg and montelukast 10 mg, administered once daily during two consecutive days, on symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis occurring in subjects exposed to ragweed pollen in an environmental exposure unit.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary location
Who can participate
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Have had seasonal allergic rhinitis due to Ragweed for the last 2 consecutive years
- Subjects who obtain a minimum sum score, considering SAR related symptoms (mean value), as defined by the protocol
Exclusion criteria
- Any clinically significant condition that might interfere with the treatment evaluation, both for efficacy and safety
- Have used forbidden concomitant medications as defined by the protocol
Treatment and study plan
Levocetirizine
DrugPrimary outcomes
-
Compare efficacy of Levocetirizine 5 mg to montelukast 10 mg as measured by the mean change from baseline of major symptoms related to SAR in ragweed sensitive subjects.
Secondary outcomes
-
Reduction in other SAR symptoms at different time points; Safety .
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
UCB Pharma
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
Double-blind, 3 Parallel Randomized Groups, Therapeutic Confirmatory. Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Levocetirizine 5 mg and Montelukast 10 mg to Placebo in Reducing SAR Symptoms in Ragweed Sensitive Subjects in an EEC.
Important dates
- Study start
- 2006
- Primary completion
- 2006
- Study completion
- 2006
- First posted
- Apr 18, 2006
- Registry last updated
- Dec 16, 2013
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Intralymphatic Immunotherapy With Polvac Grass & Rye Allergen Extract
NCT05297760
Allergic Asthma, Allergic Rhinitis
Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsA Study Comparing Two Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Sprays in the Relief of the Signs and Symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
NCT01279057
Hypersensitivity, Hypersensitivity, Immediate
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsA Study Comparing the Clinical Equivalence of Two Mometasone Nasal Sprays in the Relief of the Signs and Symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
NCT01038427
Hypersensitivity, Hypersensitivity, Immediate
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsShort and Mid-term Repeatability of Active Anterior Rhinomanometry (AAR) Measurements in Paediatric Age
NCT03286049
Hypersensitivity, Hypersensitivity, Immediate
Palermo, Sicily, Italy
View Trial Details