Pierrel Research
Timișoara, RO-300244, Romania
NCT Number: NCT01251822
This study is to compare the efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 with that of prucalopride in the treatment of chronic constipation in females. A total of 240 patients will be randomly allocated to treatment with one or the other agent. The study consists of a 14-day run-in period, with treatment subsequently administered for 28 days on a daily basis. During the study, patients will fill in a stool diary, samples of faeces will be collected, and colonic transit time will be measured prior to therapy, and from days 22 to 28 of treatment. The proportion of patients with normalised bowel movements (three or more spontaneous movements) during the last week of the study (days 22 to 28 of treatment) will be compared between treatments.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
Timișoara, RO-300244, Romania
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Each sachet of PEG 3350 is dissolved in 125 mL of water. Patients receive two sachets of PEG 3350 plus electrolytes followed by two placebo tablets for the first 14 days, after which dosage adjustment is permitted, according to effect. Each patient is treated for 28 days in total.
Patients less than 65 years of age receive a solution containing two sachets of reconstituted placebo followed by two prucalopride 1 mg tablets for 28 days.
Patients more than 65 years of age receive a solution containing two sachets of reconstituted placebo followed by one prucalopride 1 mg tablet and one placebo tablet for 28 days.
Time frame: Days 22 to 28 of treatment
Proportion of patients having normal number of spontaneous bowel movements during the last treatment week.
Norgine
Industry
Double-dummy, Double-blind, Randomised, Parallel Group, Controlled Comparative Study of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)Plus Electrolytes Versus Prucalopride in Females With Chronic Constipation Who Failed Adequate Relief With Laxatives
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04068415
Constipation, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
View Trial DetailsNCT04666155
Constipation, Constipation - Functional
Durham, County Durham and Darlington, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06311097
Constipation, Healthy
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07230821
Carbohydrate Metabolism, Inborn Errors, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Del Mar, California, United States
View Trial Details