Comparative Validation of "Blinq" and "2WIN" Vision Screeners

As a part of a new or follow-up comprehensive eye examinations, patients were screened with two novel objective devices according to AAPOS Uniform guidelines. Following the refractive, alignment and sensory testing, cycloplegic refraction was performed 30 or more minutes after cyclopentolate 1% drops. In cooperative patients, sensory tests including Worth 4-dot, Stereo Fly and "PDI Check" were performed to characterize binocularity. For younger patients, binocular function was estimated by Bruckner Test, 4- base out prism cover and the CR corneal reflex component of "2WIN" photoscreener ("Adaptica," Padova Italy).

Each patient was screened with a recently commercially released blinq screener according to manufacturer's recommendations. If an initial interpretation of "pass" or "refer" was not achieved, then repeat efforts with "timed out" or "inconclusive" were accomplished and results evaluated as if a "refer." An example of blinq birefringent screening is shown in [video].

Patients were screened with the binocular infrared autorefractor "2WIN" according to manufacturer guidelines. Refractive referral criteria were not age-stratified.

The "Rebion blinq" is a unique screening method and therefore we sought to provide appropriate validation. In addition to non-age stratified AAPOS 2003 Uniform guidelines, we collected all cases characterized by constant or persistent strabismus whether large- or small angle employing cover test, 4 base out test, Bruckner Test and "2WIN CR" function. We did not employ any method of retinal videographic analysis of fixation instability.

De-identified patient data recorded for sharing on study website.

Inclusion criteria

Children in Pediatric Ophthalmology Practice Adult strabismus patients

-

Exclusion criteria

patients with enucleations patients with eviscerations patients with exenterations

-